various judgments of this
Court including the one in Consolidated Engineering
Enterprises vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation
Department and others23, which read thus:
“21. “ Section ... Land Acquisition) and another vs. Shah
Manilal Chandulal and others29 and Consolidated
Engineering Enterprises (supra) held, that the word
“court” in Section 14 takes
then relies upon the judgment reported in 2008 (7) SCC
169 [Consolidated Engineering Enterprises vs. Principal
Secretary, Irrigation Department & Ors. ] to support its contention ... facts of the
instant case. Relying upon Consolidated Engineering (supra) and
M.P. Steel (supra) the appellant says that the parameters to be
considered
judgment of a larger Bench of this Court reported in
Consolidated Engg. Enterprises v. Irrigation Deptt. , (2008) 7 SCC
169 [“Consolidated Engg.”]. It was, therefore ... Madhya Pradesh and argued that this
Court’s judgment in Consolidated Engg. (supra), being a judgment of
three learned judges, would prevail over the judgment
Civil WP 6694 of 2018.odt
11
( vi) Consolidated Engineering Enterprises Vs.
Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department and others ,
(2008) 7 SCC 169.
(vii) Kapil ... respondent,
has also relied upon the judgments in Mukri Gopalan; Consolidated
Engineering Enterprises and Kapil (supra) which are also relied upon
by Mr. Anand Deshpande
Supreme Court on the
issue of limitation in the cases of Consolidated Engineering Enterprises
vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department & Ors. , reported ... bona fide manner
before other Courts. In the case of Consolidated Engineering Enterprises
vs. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department & Ors (supra) Full Bench
apply to arbitrations, as it applies to
proceedings in Court.”
In Consolidated Engineering v. Principal Secretary, Irrigation,3 this
Court held that :
“45. Learned counsel
delay under Section 5 of the said Act.
72. In Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal
Secretary, Irrigation Department and Ors. 16, a three-Judge
Bench
before the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of Consolidated
Engineering Enterprises Versus Principal Secretary,
Irrigation Department and Ors. wherein
prior proceedings bona fide and with due diligence.
16. In Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal
Secretary, Irrigation Department
Nigam Ltd., vs. Essar Power
Ltd. , (2008) 4 SCC 755
v) Consolidated Engineering Enterprises vs. Principal
Secretary, Irrigation Department and Others
