implying or involving, but not limited to, actual or
constructive fraud, or a design to mislead or deceive
another, or any other sinister motive. Conceptually
Smt Mariyamma vs Executive Engineer on 2 December, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:50298
WP
Shri Basavaraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 December, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC
deception may not
amount to fraud, fraud is anathema to all
equitable principles and any affair tainted with
fraud cannot be perpetuated or saved ... Kinch v. Walcott it has been held that:
"... mere constructive fraud is not, at all events
after long delay, sufficient but such a judgment
faith, generally implying or involving, but not
limited to, actual or constructive fraud, or a design
to mislead or deceive another, or any other sinister ... faith, generally implying or involving, but not
limited to actual or constructive fraud, or a design
to mislead or deceive another, or any other sinister
time bound
frame.
It thus held that there was constructive fraud played upon the State
Government by the Trust, who had failed even after lapse ... case where there was any fraud, which could be attributable either
actual or constructive, to the petitioner.
It is stated that even the substratum
time bound
frame.
It thus held that there was constructive fraud played upon the State
Government by the Trust, who had failed even after lapse ... case where there was any fraud, which could be attributable either
actual or constructive, to the petitioner.
It is stated that even the substratum
time bound
frame.
It thus held that there was constructive fraud played upon the State
Government by the Trust, who had failed even after lapse ... case where there was any fraud, which could be attributable either
actual or constructive, to the petitioner.
It is stated that even the substratum
time bound
frame.
It thus held that there was constructive fraud played upon the State
Government by the Trust, who had failed even after lapse ... case where there was any fraud, which could be attributable either
actual or constructive, to the petitioner.
It is stated that even the substratum
time bound
frame.
It thus held that there was constructive fraud played upon the State
Government by the Trust, who had failed even after lapse ... case where there was any fraud, which could be attributable either
actual or constructive, to the petitioner.
It is stated that even the substratum
