Anantha B S vs Narasimhachar K V on 6 July, 2012
acquired title
by adverse possession to the knowledge of the true owner
and a house was constructed by the 1st defendant in the
suit property
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 107 (0.15 seconds)S M Manjappa vs Suresh Basavaraj Bandammanavar on 26 July, 2012
suit and the Court fee paid is not correct. He has
constructed the building in the alleged encroached
area after obtaining valid building permission ... other things contended that he has
constructed toilet and compound wall about sixteen
:9:
years back with the knowledge of the plaintiff
Shri B N Jagannath vs Shri Raghavendra on 25 June, 2012
manner in
which the wall was constructed in any event would not
have been within the knowledge of P.W.1 and non-
production
Divisional Manager, South Central ... vs Smt Manjamma W/O Late Pujary Anand on 10 September, 2012
principal employer.
9. It is common knowledge that the Railway
Companies/Department preserve the railway-track,
constructed as a bridge on the river. Constructing,
repairing
Smt. B N Shivamma vs Sri T Srinivasaiah on 6 November, 2012
property.
27. This leads to the next question namely what
would constitute constructive notice? Section 3 of the
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 namely, interpretation
clause ... cases of actual notice but it extends to all cases of
constructive notice. As seen from the definition of
words viz., "a person
Abdul Suboor @ Gafforsab vs Sayeeeda Begum on 31 January, 2012
such
amendment, it. was pleaded that defendant- 12 has illegally
constructed a building in the suit lands bearing ... said lands. Hence the
building constructed by defendant-l2 is during the pendency of
the suit and with the knowledge of the pendency
Badanalaiah vs Smt Varanandamma on 6 November, 2012
investing
huge amount constructed a house in Item No.1 of the
suit properties. Their father without their knowledge and
consent had sold the suit
Shri P M Parameshwaramurthy vs State Of Karnataka on 21 November, 2012
Shri P M Parameshwaramurthy vs State Of Karnataka on 21 November, 2012
Author: N.Kumar
Laxman Sabanna Athani vs Mahadev Babu Bastawade on 16 August, 2012
construction was continued in the year 1989 which was
well within the knowledge of the plaintiff and further, in
view of his admission ... plaintiff he objected to the said construction as they
were constructing by encroaching upon his property
and as the defendants assured that they would
D.S. Madhava S/O Late D L Seshadri vs D.S. Dwarkanath S/O Late D L Seshadri on 31 August, 2012
permitted such construction, either by
examining any other person who had knowledge about the
family or the mother having spoken with regard to this ... plan obtained by the mother the said front portion
which is now constructed by him is also shown while
securing the approval of the plan