bonafide
purchasers of the subject property will not have any constructive knowledge
of the statutory arrears of their vendor. The relevant portion of the order ... which are
summarized below:
(a) The bona-fide purchaser has no constructive knowledge of
4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
term “due diligence”
determines the scope of a party's constructive knowledge,
claim and is very critical to the outcome of the suit
India
praying for a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from
construction Knowledge Centre at Block No.32, Old No.20 part ... writ petition has been filed seeking to forebear the
respondents from constructing ‘Knowledge Centre’ at S.No.72, Mani
Nagar, Mettupalayam.
Page
said order,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis either actual or constructive, to the party affected ... knowing the order and therefore, must be presumed to have
the knowledge of the order”, In other words the Madras High
Court has taken
which were constructed as per Agamas. It has
been held that the Archakas have to be appointed keeping in
mind temple constructed ... identify the temples constructed as
per the Agamas and, that too, with further bifurcation as to under
which Agama it was constructed. It is informed
alleged till 22.12.2003.
The Defendants effected registered partition between themselves with the
knowledge of the Plaintiff on 22.12.2003 and from that day, they ... partition, the 1st Defendant had
constructed a new house in his share in S.No.496/61 with the knowledge of
Plaintiff. The Plaintiff
observed as follows:
“It is a matter of common knowledge that illegal and
unauthorised constructions beyond the sanctioned plans are
on rise
observed as follows:
“It is a matter of common knowledge that illegal and
unauthorised constructions beyond the sanctioned plans are
on rise
house and constructions in the
suit property. It was further averred that the revision petitioners were
attempting to put up new constructions in the suit ... seeking amendment even though, the first respondent
acquired knowledge about the presence of constructions in the suit site prior
to commencement of trial. Further
days when they were on a pilgrimage to
Tiruchendur and constructed a sump and a stair-case encroaching the
second schedule property. Hence, the suit ... defendant was only with the knowledge and consent of plaintiffs 1 and
2. Even though, he had constructed the said stair-case on 15.09.1988 itself
