Sh. Amit Yadav vs Sh. Ram Kumar Rohilla on 7 April, 2017
portion 10'x10' there is a loft which was constructed without
knowledge and concern and the same came to his knowledge when
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 267 (0.96 seconds)Sh. Raj Kumar Jain vs Smt. Nirmala Jain on 25 October, 2017
favour of anyone qua suit property
which she has transferred with the knowledge and information of the
plaintiff vide instrument dated 02/02/2009. Accordingly ... alleged that D-1 constructed the house from her own source which was
in the knowledge of her husband Sh. A. R. Jain
Sh. Raj Kumar Jain vs Smt. Nirmala Jain on 25 October, 2017
favour of anyone qua suit property
which she has transferred with the knowledge and information of the
plaintiff vide instrument dated 02/02/2009. Accordingly ... alleged that D-1 constructed the house from her own source which was
in the knowledge of her husband Sh. A. R. Jain
Cs No. 18/17/88 (New No.612697/16) ... vs . M/S. Madhan & Co. & Ors. 1/67 on 20 September, 2017
plaintif is
not regular. It is denied for want of knowledge of the
answering defendant that the property stands mutated in the
Municipal records ... constructed in the year 1983 now it is original file.
To a question that why the file was re-constructed, he replied
that because
M/S Pride Constructions vs Delhi Development Authority on 22 August, 2017
reimbursed by the defendant.
CS No. 3/17/97 M/s Pride Constructions Vs DDA 7/27
17 Plaintiff further claim ... para No. A of the plaint are
denied for want of knowledge. The contents of remaining paras
also denied. It is stated that stipulated date
Vijay Kumar Bansal vs State on 8 February, 2017
father had
no money to construct his house.
41 In further cross-examination he deposed that he has
no knowledge about the bond Mark ... handwriting of his father. He denied the knowledge of document
Mark L.
44 He admitted that his father had joint bank accounts
with his mother
Cs No. 34/17/98 (New No.8872/16) R.S. ... vs . Dda & Anr. 1/41 on 1 September, 2017
same had been
constructed by the defendant no.1 in 1982. The unauthorized
demolition was without the consent, knowledge or authority
of defendant ... constructed their
houses after encroachment of DDA Land. He did not
remember the date, month and year when IOC, defendant no.
3 had constructed boundary
R/O 86 vs Shri Man Mohan Singh on 7 December, 2017
since the plaintiff did not have the
requisite expertise, knowledge and time to personally construct a
building on the said plot, she employed the defendant ... security. If the
intention of plaintiff was to get the building constructed for her
own use, she would have given payments to the defendant towards
Mohd. Ismail vs Commissioner on 6 September, 2017
suit property
is being demolished or that any boundary wall is being constructed by
the respondents as alleged in the 2 nd contempt application filed ... government on 01.05.1998 or that they constructed the
boundary wall on 2.8 1998 despite knowledge of the injunction order.
Unless the same was proved
Gopal Biswas vs Awaneesh Chandra Jha on 3 April, 2017
with the revisionist, the R-1 had the
knowledge that the building which he intended to construct was
unauthorized resulting which the MCD has demolished