without disclosing the
reasons, much less satisfactory reasons. In H.Dohil constructions
case, it was a delay of 1727 days in refiling ... stands to benefit by
instituting a proceeding beyond time. It is common
knowledge that by delaying a matter, evidence relating to the
matter in dispute
without disclosing the reasons, much less satisfactory
reasons. In H.Dohil constructions case, it was a delay of 1727 days in refiling ... stands to benefit by
instituting a proceeding beyond time. It is common knowledge
that by delaying a matter, evidence relating to the matter in
dispute
without disclosing the reasons, much less satisfactory
reasons. In H.Dohil constructions case, it was a delay of 1727 days in refiling ... stands to benefit by
instituting a proceeding beyond time. It is common knowledge
that by delaying a matter, evidence relating to the matter in
dispute
without disclosing the reasons, much less satisfactory
reasons. In H.Dohil constructions case, it was a delay of 1727 days in refiling ... stands to benefit by
instituting a proceeding beyond time. It is common knowledge
that by delaying a matter, evidence relating to the matter in
dispute
without disclosing the reasons, much less
satisfactory reasons. In H.Dohil constructions case, it was a delay of
1727 days in refiling ... stands to benefit by
instituting a proceeding beyond time. It is common
knowledge that by delaying a matter, evidence relating to the
matter in dispute
Malabar Diamond Gallery Pvt. Ltd vs The Additional Director General on 28 July, 2016
Author
R.Gowrishankar vs The Commissioner Of Service Tax ... on 13 June, 2016
Author: S.Manikumar
M.Rajendran vs The Government Of India on 4 October, 2019
Author: S. Manikumar
Bench
T.Ramesh vs The Secretary To Government on 13 September, 2019
Bench: S.Manikumar , D
The Tax Recovery Officer-I vs M/S. Sree Foundation on 18 April, 2017
Bench
