plan was approved upto second floor only and third floor was illegally constructed. In this context, the argument of the leaned counsel for the petitioners ... agreement, the petitioners must be in the knowledge of the fact that the third floor was illegally constructed. When they were party to the development
specified under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promoters of Constructions, Sale Manager and Transfer) Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the "said ... Promoters of Constructions, Sale Manager and Transfer) Act, 1963. It is clear from the agreement that despite knowledge of the fact that respondent
from constructing the said building as showcased in terms of the various documents which came to the appellant's knowledge upon enquiry. Such illegalities ... result in the demolition of the building itself if it was illegally constructed. Therefore, the State Commission completely failed to appreciate the patent illegality showcased
Lifts are not reaching the second and third basements, which have been constructed subsequently to provide more parking facility due to increase in the number ... specifications without seeking consent of the allottees or bringing it to the knowledge of the allottees.
(m) The payment of Rs.5/- (Rupees Five Only
insurance policy from respondent, the address of appellant was "Aneja Construct (I) Pvt. Ltd. ABC Chokdi, near TCI, Bharauch", but location ... case of appellant that it was brought to the knowledge of respondent that present location of Excavator is Jamnagar and location will be changed
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Shivalingappa & 2 Ors. on 8 June, 2018
NATIONAL
Virendra Arya & Anr. vs M/S. Dlf Home Developers Ltd. & Anr. on 23
Sahara Prime City Ltd. & Anr. vs Tamil Nadu Consumer Protection ... on 30 October, 2018
Splendor Landbase Ltd. & Anr. vs Satbir Singh on 2 May, 2018
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES
Neeraj Kumar Gupta & 2 Ors. vs Panchtatva Promoters (P) Ltd. & 6 Ors. on
