without disclosing the reasons, much less satisfactory
reasons. In H.Dohil constructions case, it was a delay of 1727 days in refiling ... stands to benefit by
instituting a proceeding beyond time. It is common knowledge
that by delaying a matter, evidence relating to the matter in
dispute
without disclosing the reasons, much less satisfactory
reasons. In H.Dohil constructions case, it was a delay of 1727 days in refiling ... stands to benefit by
instituting a proceeding beyond time. It is common knowledge
that by delaying a matter, evidence relating to the matter in
dispute
without disclosing the reasons, much less satisfactory
reasons. In H.Dohil constructions case, it was a delay of 1727 days in refiling ... stands to benefit by
instituting a proceeding beyond time. It is common knowledge
that by delaying a matter, evidence relating to the matter in
dispute
R.Gowrishankar vs The Commissioner Of Service Tax ... on 13 June, 2016
Author: S.Manikumar
The State Of Tamil Nadu vs Tvl. Singarappu Rangiah Shivkumar & Co on 6 December
The State Of Tamil Nadu vs Tvl. Singarappu Rangiah Shivkumar & Co on 6 December
The State Of Tamil Nadu vs Tvl. Singarappu Rangiah Shivkumar & Co on 6 December
Benq India Pvt Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Customs on 12 July, 2018
Bench: S
