upon the land since 1971 but also to the knowledge of the authorities had also constructed a house thereon and had been living therein with
Biswanath Mallick vs State Of Orissa on 21 October, 1994
Equivalent citations: 1995CRILJ1416
Author: A
death of the deceased was not within its knowledge.
3. At the threshold it was urged on behalf of respondent No. 1 that appeal filed ... deceased was a workman working under respondent No. 2 which had constructed some huts at Loliguda site for its workmen and the said huts caught
make certain technical changes as regards the tug that was to be constructed and supplied, and for that reason certain clarifications and acceptance ... were opened. 1t is not stated whether the petitioner had any prior knowledge regarding the experience of M/s.. Shalimar Works. It is, therefore, difficult
death of the deceased was not within its knowledge.
3. At the threshold it was urged on behalf of respondent No. 1 that the appeal ... deceased was a workman working under respondent No. 2 which had constructed some huts at Loliguda site for its workmen and the said huts caught
Dayanidhi Mallik And Anr. vs State on 15 September, 1994
Equivalent citations: 1995CRILJ1331, 1995(I
Pami Bisoyi And Ors. vs Lakshmana Bisoyi And Ors. on 1 August, 1994
Equivalent citations