Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 130 (0.73 seconds)

Dhanappa Irappa Koshti, vs Emkay Developers on 20 March, 2010

photographs categorically pointed out the defects in the row house constructed by the Respondent. Those defects are required to be removed by the Respondent ... builder developer in the row house constructed for the Complainant.  It is common knowledge that the builder is taking possession letter already pre-printed from
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri Sardar Inderjeet Singh (Died Per ... vs M/S Poonam Constructions A Partnership ... on 12 October, 2010

months. They admitted that the complainant was entitled for 50% of total constructed area proportionately on each floor and as per clause 26, the complainant ... full consent and knowledge of the complainant. They denied the allegation that they failed to deliver 50% of the constructed area floor wise and parking
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next