taken place or that the accused did not
have any knowledge about the alleged merger. Though, in response to a
query from the Ld. Counsel ... complainant bank instead of
Centurion Bank of Punjab and hence constructive knowledge can be
attributed to the accused about the alleged merger. Although the accused
held in para 31 as under:-
'31. Actual or constructive knowledge of the contents of the
award can be established by the collector ... records coupled with delay, can also lead to an inference
of constructive knowledge...'
40. Admittedly, in the month of April 2010 the petitioners came
been stated that the defendants have without the consent
and knowledge of the plaintiffs constructed two rooms on the
first floor and are trying ... been denied that the defendants have
without the consent and knowledge of the plaintiffs constructed
two rooms on the ground floor of the suit property
family members that the
aforesaid suit property was reconstructed in stages and to his
knowledge, it was purchased by selling the ancestral property ... family members that the
aforesaid suit property was reconstructed in stages and to his
knowledge, it was purchased by selling the ancestral property
tenanted premises. Respondent has also constructed the dochhatti in the
said shop. The respondent while constructing the dochhatti in the said
shop, has caused holes ... shop is situated. If
the respondent had constructed basement and other alteration it was well
with the knowledge of them, but they did not make
also disputed. It was claimed that
the said portion had been constructed by appellant no.2 in
ARCT No. 64/08 Bilaqis Fatima Vs. Syed ... rooms on the first floor had been constructed by
the appellant no.4 with the consent, knowledge and permission
of the landlord. Thus, the appellants
High Court of Delhi that bare knowledge of the
award is not enough. Parties must have knowledge of the contents of the
award. Further ... contents of the award were
communicated and the petitioners had constructive or actual knowledge of
the award at the time of announcement of the award
High Court of Delhi that bare knowledge of the
award is not enough. Parties must have knowledge of the contents of the
award. Further ... contents of the award were
communicated and the petitioners had constructive or actual knowledge of
the award at the time of announcement of the award
High Court of Delhi that bare knowledge of the
award is not enough. Parties must have knowledge of the contents of the
award. Further ... contents of the award were
communicated and the petitioners had constructive or actual knowledge of
the award at the time of announcement of the award
High Court of Delhi that bare knowledge of the
award is not enough. Parties must have knowledge of the contents of the
award. Further ... contents of the award were
communicated and the petitioners had constructive or actual knowledge of
the award at the time of announcement of the award
