Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

My Space Inc. vs Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. on 23 December, 2016 Bench: S. Ravindra

municipality. The Court repelled the municipality's argument, holding that constructive notice could not be inferred in the absence of any actual notification about ... municipal taxes were due, transferees of such properties were imputed with constructive knowledge of any charge created against the properties that they had purchased. This

meritless. 12. The last submission pertained to the plaintiff's alleged knowledge that Gur Buksh Singh had sold the suit lands. Now, the order ... their knowledge about the transfer. The averments in the application did not, however, indicate any such knowledge; nor can there be any constructive knowledge about

meritless. 12. The last submission pertained to the plaintiff's alleged knowledge that Gur Buksh Singh had sold the suit lands. Now, the order ... their knowledge about the transfer. The averments in the application did not, however, indicate any such knowledge; nor can there be any constructive knowledge about

General Important current affairs 30 Knowledge/ – relating to the Current Affairs International, National, State the important events place personality, constructions, International, relating to the State ... Award / Sports, Indian, culture and Arts etc. Logic Analogies, assertion and 5 Knowledge reason, binary logic, classification, clocks and calendars, coded inequalities, coding- decoding, critical

property as constructive trustees for the benefit of other heirs. Even if the Court were to reasonably assume lack of knowledge about the registered Perpetual ... plaintiff is deemed to have knowledge about it, from that time. In any case, once actual knowledge is presumed, from the date of filing

respondent that the proceedings under Section 81 were time barred since the constructions were raised far back in point of time. He also rejected ... land and not the date of knowledge. 26. Coming to the issue of knowledge in the present case, it has to be noticed that

third party, i.e. Sh. Bansal, without knowledge or notice acquired rights, and proceeded to construct on the plot, too cannot be ignored. The learned

common knowledge, under the various schemes floated by bodies like housing boards, houses are constructed on a large scale and allotted on part payment

contentions (i.e. Meena Rani and Nalini Gupta) about lack of knowledge was difficult to believe. The Division Bench had observed as follows ... applicant was in the process of erecting a boundary wall and constructing a chowkidar room on the plot. It assumes importance that the applicant claims