Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 11 July, 2022
Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 11 July, 2022
Author: M. M
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 101 (1.32 seconds)Vinay Construction Co. And Ors. vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And Anr. on 27 November, 2003
Constructions is @ 20.10% above against the justification of 24.10% above. The said quoted rates by you and Jindal Builders along with M/s. Mazdoor Constructions ... Mazdoor Constructions. The said quoted rates by you and Vinay Const. Co. along with M/s. Mazdoor Constructions clearly show that the pooling had been
M/S.Gas Authority Of India Ltd. Through ... vs M/S.Indian Petrochem.Corp.Ltd. ... on 8 February, 2023
justification for levy of loss of transportation
charges was that GAIL had made a huge investment in constructing its own
infrastructure ... huge investment in constructing the HBJ
pipeline, but at the same time IPC L had also made a huge investment in
constructing its own pipelines
Dilip Buildcon Ltd. vs The State Of Maharashtra on 16 September, 2019
grounds broadly raised relate
to irreparable loss and injury being caused to water
bodies and dams constructed by the Government for which
explosive material
S.Ramadevi vs The Special Officer on 5 August, 2016
willful and wanton premeditation with a view to cause loss to the assets of the Society and ''mere negligence cannot be a ground ... injury or loss is likely to result from the act done or from the omission to act. It imports a constructive intention
Taijuddin vs State Of Assam on 1 December, 2021
land dispute caused the loss of life of Abdul Wahab (‘the
victim’). A house was being constructed on land stated to be of the
victim
Dda & Anr. vs Pt.Munshi Ram & Associates (P) Ltd. on 1 November, 2012
Constructive Builders and
Anr. , 2004 (3) Arb. LR 291, a Division Bench of this Court upheld
the grant of amounts for losses suffered on account
Chander Mohan And Ors. vs Delhi Development Authority And Ors. on 3 April, 2003
writ petition, the complex partly constructed has remained in the same position unoccupied, which is really a loss of national resources. The shopping and office
Cellulosix Ltd. And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 25 November, 2013
petitioners constructed with the finance
availed of in the year 1984 did not take off and there were alleged losses
which resulted ultimately in proceedings
K.R.Ramaswamy Alias Traffic Ramaswamy vs The Chief Secretary/Vigilance Officer on 26 February, 2016
everything. Such constructions require investment of material and manpower and though they may be privately owned, the destruction is also a loss to the society