accused in
furtherance of common intention demolished
the compound constructed around the
property, caused loss to the tune ... filthy language, demolished the compound
constructed around the property, caused loss to the tune of
Rs.1,00,000/- and threatened him to kill
constructed area as per the calculations given in
paragraph 112 above.
14. Direct the claimant to pay to the respondents as compensation
towards loss ... compensation towards loss of future rents in
respect of the respondents’ constructed area of 93,050 sq. ft..,
calculated from today till 30.11.2017 along with
estimate of the loss suffered by PCL. L&T had
pleaded that they were entitled to 75% of the total constructed
area while
there were landslides,
it would affect the building constructed and there would
not only have been loss of money, but also loss of lives
Soundarya Constructions, incorporated in 1994. Respondent
No.4 was working as a manager in M/s. Soundarya
Constructions.
3.2 On 14th April 2024, the husband ... husband has incurred a loss of Rs.60 crore and was cheated
by the partners of M/s. Soundarya Constructions i.e.
respondent
Advocate that the opposite party has already constructed a building on
the suit premises causing immense loss injury, prejudice and hardship to the
petitioner. Interim
Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited & Anr vs M/S Koneru Constructions on 26 November, 2025
Author: Sachin Datta
Bench: Sachin Datta
$~J
* IN THE HIGH ... loss in escalation of rates due
to abnormal prolongation of contract @ 10% of the executed value.
30. Rs. 36,45,360/- towards damages for loss
loss suffered
by him due to the fire incident. It is the legal
obligation of the respondent to compensate the
insured for the loss suffered ... been
given by the Surveyor to exclude the assessment of loss regarding the sheds
constructed on the third floor of the property. The Arbitrator
cause unnecessary loss to
2025:KER:33842
W.P (C) Nos.29297 & 29700 of 2024 27
the public exchequer. (See: Silppi Constructions Contractors
interfere
where such interference will cause unnecessary loss to the public
exchequer. (See Silppi Constructions Contractors v. Union of
India [Silppi Constructions Contractors v. Union
