aware if any person was
present outside the premises since he was not present at spot and was
also not aware of the conduct ... conclusive evidence led by the complainant to show that the
registered consumer was aware as of the fact that the unit was being
offered to the consumer or his
representative. It can be concluded that consumer was not aware when
the meter will be tested in the laboratory ... whether the
consumer is present in the laboratory to see the testing or not. There is
no evidence that consumer was aware about the date
accused has applied for a fresh
connection.
6. He is not aware if consumer had lodged a complaint on
3.10.2007 in the office which ... dated 7.8.08 bears the stamp of their
office. He is not aware if meters No. 14003654, 646 and 641 were
changed on 11.08.2008 and meter
aware of the final order, informed about it
and whether there is deliberate disobedience of such final order passed in
the consumer complaint. Ld. District ... Consumer Protection
Act, 1986 so as to expedite the execution proceeding and to pass necessary
orders by recording the findings as to awareness
cause notice
was sent to the consumer. The show notice was Ex. CW2/F (already
exhibited). The consumer was asked to explain the irregularities ... consumer filed its reply which was already Ex. CW2/G. The consumer also
attended personal hearing on 16.06.2009 and denied the awareness of
meter
reports to the consumer at site but the same was refused by the consumer.
However, PW4 deposed that he is not aware if the documents ... present at site but it does not mean if user or consumer was not present at
the time of inspection, the theft of electricity
landlord of the inspected premises and accused
Ashiya Begum being registered consumer are liable for abetment of the
offence of direct theft of electricity ... though, he was well aware that co-accused/user Mohd. Yusuf
is indulged in direct theft of electricity. Being registered consumer,
accused Ashiya Begum
accused Nirmal Kaur
being the landlord as well as registered consumer is liable for abetment of
the offence of direct theft of electricity as they ... though, she was well aware that co-accused/user Ranjeet Singh
is indulged in direct theft of electricity. Being registered consumer,
accused Nirmal Kaur
provision of section 150 of the Act, accused
Farahim Khan being registered consumer is liable for abetment of the
offence of direct theft of electricity ... needful though, he was well
aware that accused/user is indulged in direct theft of electricity. Being
registered consumer as well as landlord, accused Farahim
knowledge about the capacity of the
transformers meant for supplying electricity to consumer meter. He
admitted that there were no instruments of the capacity ... cross examination, he deposed that he is not aware of any
complaint given by the consumer for defect in his meter. He admitted
that
