Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New
Delhi, came to the conclusion, that the second Consumer Complaint, on the same
cause of action, was not maintainable, before ... Consumer Disputes Redressal
Commission, New Delhi, that when the first Consumer Complaint, was dismissed
for non-prosecution, then the second Consumer Complaint, was not maintainable
does not fall under the definition of consumer as
provided under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and that the
consumer complaint is not maintainable before ... consumer" as provided under the
provisions of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and, as such, his
consumer complaint was not maintainable before the Consumer Fora
there is an arbitration clause in buyers agreement and hence consumer complaint is not maintainable before this Commission. The complainants were offered possession about three ... arbitration clause in buyer's agreement and hence consumer complaint is not maintainable. The complainants were offered possession about three years
profits, the
complainant did not fall within the definition of a consumer, and, as such, the consumer
complaint was not maintainable. In Nijjar
Cold Storages ... case, that the complainant did not fall within the
definition of a consumer and the consumer complaint was not maintainable. The facts of the aforesaid
not be said that the complainant did not fall
under the definition of a consumer , and, as such, the Consumer Complaint was not maintainable ... case that the
complainant did not fall within the definition of a consumer and the Consumer Complaint was not
maintainable. The facts of the aforesaid
real estate, and, as such, he was not consumer and, therefore, the consumer
complaint was not maintainable. He further submitted that the complainant purchased ... could not be concluded that the complainant did not fall under the
definition of consumer , and, as such,
his consumer complaint was not maintainable
real estate, and, as such, he was not consumer and, therefore, the consumer
complaint was not maintainable. He further submitted that the complainant purchased ... could not be concluded, that the complainant did not fall under the
definition of consumer , and, as such,
his consumer complaint was not maintainable
individual consumer
maintainable before a Consumer Fora. In the instant case, the
consumer complaint has been filed by a single consumer and not by
group ... said decision shall not apply in the
instant case and it can not be held that the consumer complaint is not
maintainable before the Consumer
Insurer was not a `consumer' as defined in the
Act and a complaint under the Act was not maintainable.
(iii) The letter of subrogation ... alone files the complaint in
its own name, the complaint will not be maintainable, as
the insurer is not a `consumer', nor a person
takes an examination is not a `consumer' and consequently, complaint under the Act will not be maintainable against the Board."
(Emphasis supplied ... takes an examination is not a `consumer' and consequently, complaint under the Act will not be maintainable against the Board."
(Emphasis added
