Authority further erred in
treating Respondent No. 2 as a consumer. The statutory definition
is clear. A consumer is one in whose name the connection ... undisclosed. It was
unauthorised. It cannot fall within the definition of consumer
merely because he happened to occupy the premises.
40. The Appellate Authority
Authority further erred in
treating Respondent No. 2 as a consumer. The statutory definition
is clear. A consumer is one in whose name the connection ... undisclosed. It was
unauthorised. It cannot fall within the definition of consumer
merely because he happened to occupy the premises.
40. The Appellate Authority
Authority further erred in
treating Respondent No. 2 as a consumer. The statutory definition
is clear. A consumer is one in whose name the connection ... undisclosed. It was
unauthorised. It cannot fall within the definition of consumer
merely because he happened to occupy the premises.
40. The Appellate Authority
Authority further erred in
treating Respondent No. 2 as a consumer. The statutory definition
is clear. A consumer is one in whose name the connection ... undisclosed. It was
unauthorised. It cannot fall within the definition of consumer
merely because he happened to occupy the premises.
40. The Appellate Authority
Authority further erred in
treating Respondent No. 2 as a consumer. The statutory definition
is clear. A consumer is one in whose name the connection ... undisclosed. It was
unauthorised. It cannot fall within the definition of consumer
merely because he happened to occupy the premises.
40. The Appellate Authority
Authority further erred in
treating Respondent No. 2 as a consumer. The statutory definition
is clear. A consumer is one in whose name the connection ... undisclosed. It was
unauthorised. It cannot fall within the definition of consumer
merely because he happened to occupy the premises.
40. The Appellate Authority
Authority further erred in
treating Respondent No. 2 as a consumer. The statutory definition
is clear. A consumer is one in whose name the connection ... undisclosed. It was
unauthorised. It cannot fall within the definition of consumer
merely because he happened to occupy the premises.
40. The Appellate Authority
that the condominium
is not a consumer within the meaning of Section 2(1)(d) of the
Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Therefore, according ... maintainable.
7. Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act defines the
term consumer. The Act also defines the term person. The
2
::: Uploaded
Geopreneur Corp Pvt. Ltd. Thr Its ... vs Competent Authority And District ... on 24 February, 2026
Ratan Co Op Hsg. Soc Ltd. Trho. Its ... vs Competent Authority And District ... on 24
