Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 8079 (1.71 seconds)

M/S Transasia Bio-Medicals Ltd vs Deepak Kumar Jindal, on 6 November, 2012

coming to the conclusion, that the complainant fell within the definition of consumer. The findings of the District Forum, in this regard, being correct ... definition of a consumer. Feeling aggrieved, an appeal was filed, before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, held that
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

M/S Transasia Bio-Medicals Ltd. vs Deepak Kumar Jindal on 6 November, 2012

coming to the conclusion, that the complainant fell within the definition of consumer. The findings of the District Forum, in this regard, being correct ... definition of a consumer. Feeling aggrieved, an appeal was filed, before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, held that
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ms.Sona Sharma vs 1. M/S Greenfield Sites Management ... on 2 April, 2012

ground, that she (complainant) did not fall within the definition of a consumer, and, as such, the complaint was not maintainable. 2.      The facts ... definition of a consumer. Feeling aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, held that
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Balwinder Singh vs Dr. Sonia Gupta on 3 July, 2025

extent that the Complainant was not covered under the definition of 'Consumer' because the patient had taken the treatment from Government Hospital, without ... hence, neither the patient nor the Complainant falls under the definition of 'Consumer'. There was no medical negligence on the part
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next