definition of "consumer" and cannot be said to be "consumer" as per the provisions of Consumer Protection ... consumer" as provided under the provisions of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and, as such the consumer complaint was not maintainable before the Consumer Fora
further stated that the complainant/respondent did not fall within the definition of Consumer, as he has served as employee of the petitioner and hence ... benefit of the employee. It was further held that since the definition of consumer under the Act includes not only the person who hires
maintainable, as he did not fall within the definition of a consumer. At the same time, liberty was granted by the District Forum ... requires consideration, is, as to whether, the complainant fell within the definition of consumer, as defined by Section 2(1)(d) of the Act. Section
Forum has failed to appreciate the purview and ambit of the definition of consumer, consumer disputes, deficiency in service, commercial transactions and unfair trade practice ... consumer, a person who purchased share in bulk, cannot be considered as consumer and the dispute arose in that regard cannot be considered as consumer
question cannot be termed as commercial purpose as mentioned in the definition of consumer under the Consumer Protection Act .
The learned counsel for the complainant ... Protection Act . Of course, there is an Explanation to the said definition of consumer which provides that commercial purpose does not include
ground that he did not fall within the definition of a consumer, and, as such, the same (complaint) was not maintainable..
The facts, in brief ... version pleaded that the complainant did not fall within the definition of a consumer, as defined under Section
petitioner (seller) that the respondent is not covered under the definition of consumer as defined under Section ... contended that the complainant does not fall within the definition of consumer as defined under Section
deceased, therefore, she does not fall within the definition of the
consumer and that there was no negligence on the part of this ... contended that the complainants do not fall under the definition of the
consumer. A specific plea was taken by OP No. 3 in the written
complaint as the complainant does not fall within
the definition of consumer and that he is operating the JCB machine
for commercial purpose ... commercial purpose, then the purchaser does not
come within the definition of consumer. He further submitted that
the said machine was purchased to earn
Company, it did not fall within the definition of a consumer. On this ground alone, complaint was liable to be rejected. It was further pleaded ... business at Delhi, it did not fall within the definition of a consumer. The submission made by the Opposite Party, in this regard, does
