Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad
which had reversed the view of the District Consumer Forum that the
complainant is a “consumer” within the definition under ... abovementioned definition was amended in the year 1993. The
definition under Section 2(1)(d) that defined “consumer” after the
amendment of 1993 read
Consumer as envisaged under Section 2 (1) (d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and submitted that on plain reading of the aforesaid definition ... Consumer as envisaged under Section 2 (1) (d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and submitted that on plain reading of the aforesaid definition
reversed the view of the District Consumer Forum
that the complainant is a “consumer” within the definition
2
under Section ... abovementioned definition was amended in the year
1993. The definition under Section 2(1)(d) that defined
“consumer” after the amendment of 1993 read
reliefs which are being
sought are not covered under the definition of "consumer dispute".
The issues raised relate to the contractual matters arising ... Being the re-
allottees they are not covered under the definition of 'consumer'. No
cause of action has arisen to both the sets
record
District Consumer Forum held that complainant falls under the
definition of consumer and therefore complaint is maintainable.
Further it is held that opponent committed ... record
District Consumer Forum held that complainant falls under the
definition of consumer and therefore complaint is maintainable.
Further it is held that opponent committed
opposite party bank, the complainant is squarely covered under the definition of 'consumer'. It is further contended that Supreme Court in the matter ... April 2003. It may be noted that in the original definition of consumer as given in Section
purchase of goods will not fall within the scope of the definition of consumer. He also referred to the principle of law laid down ... payment and as such, he falls within the ambit of the definition of consumer as provided under section
construction activities, the respondent would not fall within the definition of consumer, as defined under Section 2 (1) (d) of the Act. Besides that technical ... services. To this vide definition the section itself provides an exclusion and it excludes a person from the definition of consumer who obtains such goods
decided is, whether the complainant
falls under the definition of 'consumer'? That definition is reproduced
below:-
"2(1)(d) "consumer ... self-employment the purchaser falls
under the definition of 'consumer'. That was a plot, which was
purchased from the Municipal Board and there
cropped up as to
whether the complainant falls within the definition of 'consumer', as
contained in the Act? Learned counsel for the complainant ... complainant, which makes her to fall under the definition
of 'consumer'.
7. On the other hand, it has been submitted by the learned
