farmers who are otherwise covered by the wide definition of "consumer" under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection ... farmers who are otherwise covered by the wide definition of "consumer" under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection
that 'whether the complainant falls under the definition of 'Consumer' or not?
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in U.T. Chandigarh ... farmers who are otherwise covered by the wide definition of "consumer" under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection
farmers who are otherwise covered by the wide definition of "consumer" under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection ... farmers who are otherwise covered by the wide definition of "consumer" under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection
Consumer u/s 2(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986?
(2) Whether this State Commission has territorial jurisdiction
to adjudicate upon the present consumer ... avails of service for commercial
purpose from the ambit of the definition „consumer‟. Explanation
u/s 2(d) provides clarification that "commercial purpose does
necessarily relate to identified premises;
ii. The definition of consumer under Section 2(15) of the 2003 Act
includes “any person whose premises ... with respect to consumer
(i) The reference to “premises” in the definition of “consumer” under
Section 2(15) as well as under Section
consumer and hence the
commercial enterprise can be a buyer/consumer and can enforce
its rights as a consumer, provided immediate intent is to generate ... sets of words.
and after a fair analysis of the definition “consumer”
postamendment 1993 finally held as under:
“21. We must, therefore, hold that
that appellants would not fall
within the four corners of the definition of
‘consumer’ as defined under Section ... such purchaser would not fall within the four corners
of the definition of ‘consumer’. On the other hand,
if the answer is in the negative
produced on record. The
complainant was not falling under the definition of 'consumer' as
provided under the Consumer Protection Act . It has been ... appellant/opposite party, the
complainant does not fall under the definition of 'consumer', as he
was using the electric connection for commercial purpose
complainant was not falling under the definition of 'consumer' as
provided under the Consumer Protection Act . It has been stated in the
complaint ... appellant/opposite party, the
complainant does not fall under the definition of 'consumer', on the
ground that he was using the electric connection
raised is that the
complainant is not covered under the definition of 'consumer' and the
property was purchased for earning profits for commercial ... under the definition of 'service'. So, the complainant falls under the
definition of 'consumer' as defined in Section
