Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1019 (0.85 seconds)

M/S Transasia Bio-Medicals Ltd vs Deepak Kumar Jindal, on 6 November, 2012

coming to the conclusion, that the complainant fell within the definition of consumer. The findings of the District Forum, in this regard, being correct ... definition of a consumer. Feeling aggrieved, an appeal was filed, before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, held that
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

M/S Transasia Bio-Medicals Ltd. vs Deepak Kumar Jindal on 6 November, 2012

coming to the conclusion, that the complainant fell within the definition of consumer. The findings of the District Forum, in this regard, being correct ... definition of a consumer. Feeling aggrieved, an appeal was filed, before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, held that
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ms.Sona Sharma vs 1. M/S Greenfield Sites Management ... on 2 April, 2012

ground, that she (complainant) did not fall within the definition of a consumer, and, as such, the complaint was not maintainable. 2.      The facts ... definition of a consumer. Feeling aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, held that
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrs.Meenakshi Tuli Pasrija vs M/S Greenfield Sites Management ... on 2 April, 2012

obviously for commercial purpose, she did not fall within the definition of a consumer. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, in the aforesaid case, held ... definition of a consumer. Feeling aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, held that
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Greater Mohali Area Development ... vs 1. Mrs. Anudweep on 3 December, 2012

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, and the Hon`ble Supreme Court, in the aforesaid case, considered the complainant as a consumer ... proceeded against ex-parte.      The complainants fall within definition of consumer.      The submission of the Counsel for the appellant----, being devoid of merit, must fail
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next