responsibility altogether and,
therefore, the impugned judgment of District Consumer Disputes
Redressal Forum as well as State Consumer Disputes Redressal
S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION ... Consumer Protection
Act as a `service provider' and the complainant would be a `consumer'
and, thus, applicability of the Consumer Protection
relevant provisions of consumer Protection
Act:
a). That a Consumer complaint No. 30 of 2016 was
filed before the District consumer grievance and redressal
forum ... Consumer Protection Act, bearing
Consumer Complaint No. 30 of 2016. The said Tamil Arji
is currently pending before the Consumer Forum. Due to
the petitioner
chargeable on the actual amount of demand charge realizable
from the consumer.
JUDGMENT:
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal ... considered by the
supplier to be beyond the control of the
consumer the consumer shall be entitled to a
proportionate reduction of demand
charges/minimum
3842 of 2016:- The petitioner is a consumer
under Electrical Section, Valapattanam with Consumer No.1963 under
LT-IV industrial tariff, with a sanctioned connected ... which such consumer belongs and the purpose for which the power is
sanctioned to such consumer. Para.16 of the judgment reads thus
note of the
arguments advanced on behalf of the appellant/consumer relying on
the judgment of this Court in J.D.T. Islam Orphanage
Committee ... within
the purview of clause (vi) of Para.31 of the judgment, a consumer
who is blamed with overdrawal of electricity in excess of
sanctioned
learned Counsel has relied upon the decision of the the judgment of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (Hon'ble Mr. Justice ... this regard, the learned Counsel has also relied upon another Judgment National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in the case of Hundi Lal Jain
Dlf Ltd And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 18 February, 2015
Equivalent
4668/2016 JUDGMENT
from the consumer.
[4] It is submitted that the respondent no.1 had floated a
scheme of bungalows on particular survey ... infrastructure so
as to reach electric connection of the consumer like
respondents-consumers. The consumer forum has rejected the
application by holding that
District Consumer
Forum. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the District Consumer
Forum, the petitioner approached the State Consumer Forum, and
State Consumer Forum ... they were not necessary
party before the District Consumer Forum. The District Consumer
Forum in its judgment dated 04.11.2016 in Execution Application no.
1/2010
prospective consumer to deposit arrears of electricity dues payable
by the former consumer and therefore, held that the ratio of the
judgment in Isha Marbles ... 5071/2003 JUDGMENT
consumer on 22.3.2004 and recommended that the benefit of the
circular dated 7.2.2004 was available to the petitioner. Mr. Savjani
thus urged