Section 13 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
resumed for one year or upwards; or (iv) that her marriage (whether consummated or not) was solemnised before she attained the age of fifteen years
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10335 (0.04 seconds)Shayara Bano vs Union Of India And Ors. Ministry Of Women ... on 22 August, 2017
same is
reproduced below:
“237. And if ye divorce them
Before consummation,
27
But after the fixation
Of a dower for them,
Then the half ... sees well
All that ye do.”
In case of divorce before consummation of marriage, it is
recognized, that only half the dower fixed needed
Section 12 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
following grounds, namely: (a) that the marriage has not been consummated owing to the impotence of the respondent; or (b) that the marriage
Section 10 in Indian Divorce Act, 1869 [Entire Act]
respondent had been alive; or (vii) has wilfully refused to consummate the marriage and the marriage has not therefore been consummated; or (viii) has failed
Section 6 in The Competition Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
details of the proposed combination, [after any of the following, but before consummation of the combination]- (a) approval of the proposal relating to merger ... order passed or any fee imposed or combination consummated or resolution passed or direction given or instrument executed or issued or thing done under
Section 2 in Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act 1939 [Entire Act]
eighteen years; Provide that the marriage has not been consummated; (8) that the husband treas her with cruelty, that
Section 2 in The Dissolution Of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 [Entire Act]
eighteen years: Provided that the marriage has not been consummated; (viii) that the husband treats her with cruelty, that is to say,— (a) habitually assaults
Section 25 in The Special Marriage Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
decree of nullity if (i) the marriage has not been consummated owing to the wilful refusal of the respondent to consummate the marriage
Yuvraj Digvijay Singh vs Yuvrani Pratap Kumari on 2 May, 1969
grounds of impotence, invincible repugnance
to sexual act and inability to consummate marriage though
neither party proved impotent.
HEADNOTE:
The appellant married the respondent according ... parties lived
together for three years but the marriage was not
consummated. The appellant filed an application before the
District Judge at Delhi on March
T. Rangaswami vs T. Aravindammal on 10 August, 1956
sterility arise when divorce is sought (a) because, marriage cannot be consummated (i.e., one of the parties is incapable of complete sexual intercourse ... incapacity for consummation can-not be surgically remedied, or, the defective party is unwilling to submit to a surgical operation; or (c) if the incapacity