settled that once a final order is passed, the Interim
Order merges into the final Order and the Interim Order (including
all directions thereunder) automatically ... proceedings
ig against the said interim order dated
21.10.2013, all interim orders including the said order and the order
dated 9.12.2013 and all directions thereunder
application for vacation of stay order is pending for vacating the interim order , the contempt petition filed by the applicant under the Contempt of Courts ... compliance of interim order in respect to interim order is maintainable . It is further directed that the contempt petition is differed till disposal
intentionally violated interim
orders of this Court. No doubt, the High Court,
granted interim injunction in Civil Application
in Appeal from Order on July ... both interim orders
passed by this Court; (i) order, dated April
26, 2004, and (ii) order, dated January 10,
2005. Under the first order, larger
respondents to have the interim order vacated may jeopardise
the public interest. [346G-347A]
3. If an interim order is once made by a court ... Courts and to
have the interim orders vacated. In the present case, an
application to vacate the interim order was filed in the
Calcutta High
therefore held that the order dated 12.1.2007 is unsustainable.
The interim order in the contempt proceedings.
16. The respondent's complaint in the contempt ... parte interim order granted by the High Court on
12.1.2007. No period was prescribed by the High Court for compliance with
its interim order
parte interim order dated 06.08.2013, filed contempt
petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the
appellants being Contempt Petition ... contempt petition
complaining therein that the appellants have again committed fresh contempt
by willfully violating/disobeying the ex parte interim order dated
06.08.2013 and hence
Kirloskar Electric Co Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 January, 2018
Author: Vineet
Vide order dated 4.4.2003 passed by writ court the aforesaid order has been stayed. The interim order dated 4.4.2003 is reproduced as under:
In view ... defiance and disobedience of the interim order either passed by writ court or order dated 18.9.2004 passed by contempt court and the appellant cannot
proceedings, no interim order and any further orders would be passed, except to see whether there is any violation of the orders passed.
9. Repelling ... Tribunal has any jurisdiction to pass any interim orders or further orders on proceedings initiated for contempt, the power of contempt as conferred under Section
order/interim order dated 06.10.2010 passed in
Civil Application No.4816/2008 in First Appeal No.1996/2008, under
the provisions of the Contempt ... interim order passed by this Court in Civil
Application No.4816/2008 vide order dated 17.04.2008 read with
the order dated 06.10.2010. The Division Bench
