assumed that the initial order of stay got confirmed by the
subsequent orders passed in the contempt matter.
7. We, therefore, hold that the High ... earlier or at least
simultaneously with the complaint for contempt. To keep the
prayer for stay stand-by and to insist upon proceeding with
S.Thangamani vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 28 November, 2017
Author: S.Manikumar
proceedings were drawn on account of non-compliance of interim stay order against which stay vacation application of respondents in writ petition was pending before ... learned single Judge of the High Court was not stayed by Division Bench, the contempt petition should have been disposed of on merits instead
Singh. In that writ petition, the petitioners also moved a stay application praying to stay the operation of the order dated 8.4.1998 aforesaid. The said ... inform the Court about the compliance of the stay order even if the stay vacation is not heard and disposed of. In pursuance of this
Rule 2A read with Section 151 CPC and Section 12 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents ... dismissal of stay application by
the Division Bench for stay of operation of order in FAO
155/99.
17.1. The above three contempt petitions were
wherein by way of an interim order dated 25.2.2002, the contempt proceedings were stayed. He, therefore, contended that since no senior general category candidate
Supreme Court have been placed on record staying the
Contempt proceedings in identical matters. The relevant portion of the
grounds taken in the writ petition ... Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 19:36:17 :::HCHP
7
stayed the contempt proceedings. A copy of the said stay
.
order passed by the Supreme
wherein by way of an interim order dated 25.2.2002, the contempt proceedings were stayed. He, therefore, contended that since no senior general category candidate
wherein by way of an interim order dated 25.2.2002, the contempt proceedings were stayed. He, therefore, contended that since no senior general category candidate
determined mind. The petitioner further
points to the respondent willingly defying the stay granted by the Court in
OMP 447/2011. The petitioner‟s case ... application of the petitioner seeking initiation of contempt and
also refused to grant relief staying the blacklisting order. It is submitted by
Mr. Poddar that
