sister marriage. Accused has taken contention that
signature and contents written in the cheque are not
belongs to her and there is difference ... complainant that the
cheque was issued for discharge of debt, said cheque was
presented for encashment. Cheque was returned for funds
insufficient. Then he ought
accused kept the cheque. After that
the complainant demanded cheque. The accused
refused to give cheque, due to verify the contents by
their technician ... accused main contention is that auditor is not belong to
the accused company. The contention of the complaint
is that content transfer agreement entered
cross
examination has clearly admitted that he filled the
contents of the cheque, by this it is clear that the
cheque in dispute was blank ... agreement.
And he further admitted that he himself filled the
contents in the cheque and presented the cheque. The
C.C.NO.4701/2020
cheque nor his signature on the cheque or the
presentation of cheque for encashment before the bank
within its validity or the dishonour of cheque ... return the cheque
and the complainant has received the cheque in
question from Umesh Bhat without his consent and
presented the cheque after lapse
issued the cheque. On the other hand she has taken
contention that said cheque was not issued for discharge of
debt to the respondent, said ... appellant
your cheque is dishonored and to pay the amount mentioned
in the cheque. Apart from it he may not write entire contents
cheque in question was not proved. It was
also contended that the accused was handed over a duly written
and signed cheque ... Bank under the
cheque Ex.P9 forging the contents of the cheque ;
iv) The recovery of Rs.95,000/- at the instance
cheque in question was not proved. It was
also contended that the accused was handed over a duly written
and signed cheque ... Bank under the
cheque Ex.P9 forging the contents of the cheque ;
iv) The recovery of Rs.95,000/- at the instance
cheque was endorsed in Hindi language, whereas
rest of the contents of the cheque was filled up in
Gujarati language. It had emerged on record ... examination of the complainant,
was that hand writing of the content of the cheque appears in Gujarati
language whereas signature of the respondent-accused
marked Ex.P1 to P6 in support of his contention. The cheque in
question marked as Ex.P1. The endorsement of bank ... issued any reply nor
he has repaid the cheque amount. Therefore, it is the contention
of the complainant that the accused has committed the offence
petitioner has all along denied having
filled up the contents of the cheque in question. He categorically denied
having any relation with the respondent ... ascertain whether the respondent herein had filled up the
contents of the cheque or not.
14. Thus, having examined the impugned judgment and order
