collusion with the contesting opposite parties and had wrongly and illegally helped the contesting opposite parties in obtaining the ex parte decree.
3. The contesting ... judgment dated 10-6-1969, set aside the decree in favour of the contesting opposite parties as is evident from Annexure "II" attached
merged in the decree of the appellate court, only in so far as the original decree affected the two contesting defendants ... whom had contested the suit, and others had not entered appearance. The contesting defendants preferred an appeal, making the non-contesting defendants parties respondent
would be unsafe to treat anything short of a decree in a suit contested to the end as coming within the ruling in the Shiva ... must have been passed after full contest, and a compromise decree or a decree on an arbitration award can have no higher footing than
merged in the decree of the Appellate Court, only in so far as the original decree affected the two contesting defendants ... whom had contested the suit, and others had not entered appearance. The contesting defendants preferred an appeal making the non-contesting defendants parties respondent
decree. The compromise stands merged in the decree and cannot have a separate existence or identity from the decree itself. Consequently once a decree ... decree for ejectment. The only difference between a consent decree or a decree on a compromise on the one hand and a decree after contest
infirmity but the admission regarding the claim of the contesting opposite (party) in the compromise decree would be a good piece of evidence ... terms of the decree in full. A decree based upon a compromise is just asmuch binding as a decree founded upon a decision on merits
record a compromise, it shall be open to the appellant to contest the decree on the ground that the compromise should, or should not, have ... contested, the bar under Section 96 (3) will not come into play. The order passed by the court on such contest and the resultant decree
matter was not carried any further by the contesting defendants, as such, the decree dated 31.3.1999 passed in O.S. no. 28 of 1996, attained ... that an ex-parte decree is as good as a contesting decree unless it is set aside. An ex-parte decree can be set aside
consent decree, as is well known, is as good as a contested decree. Such a decree must be set aside if it has been passed
that neither Gulab Lal or his heirs had any occasion to contest a decree the entry whereof was being assailed by them as invalid ... that Gulab Lal or his heirs did not choose to contest the said decree has to be rejected. The petitioner can always raise a plea
