1318/1980 and granted
decree for partition. Hence, the judgment and decree
passed in RFA amounts to continuation of the decree of
City Civil Court ... 2001 are dismissed. Defendant No.18 has
contested the final decree proceedings in view of certain
observations made in RFA No.606/1989 and subsequent
respondents and
was upheld by the High Court. The decree having been passed after contest,
cannot be interfered with unless the counsel could prove perversity ... equity and
good conscience of this Court beseeching interference with a contested decree
passed in favour of the respondents.
9. It is no doubt true
respondents and
was upheld by the High Court. The decree having been passed after contest,
cannot be interfered with unless the counsel could prove perversity ... equity and
good conscience of this Court beseeching interference with a contested decree
passed in favour of the respondents.
9. It is no doubt true
respondents and
was upheld by the High Court. The decree having been passed after contest,
cannot be interfered with unless the counsel could prove perversity ... equity and
good conscience of this Court beseeching interference with a contested decree
passed in favour of the respondents.
9. It is no doubt true
respondents and
was upheld by the High Court. The decree having been passed after contest,
cannot be interfered with unless the counsel could prove perversity ... equity and
good conscience of this Court beseeching interference with a contested decree
passed in favour of the respondents.
9. It is no doubt true
respondents and
was upheld by the High Court. The decree having been passed after contest,
cannot be interfered with unless the counsel could prove perversity ... equity and
good conscience of this Court beseeching interference with a contested decree
passed in favour of the respondents.
9. It is no doubt true
respondents and
was upheld by the High Court. The decree having been passed after contest,
cannot be interfered with unless the counsel could prove perversity ... equity and
good conscience of this Court beseeching interference with a contested decree
passed in favour of the respondents.
9. It is no doubt true
respondents and
was upheld by the High Court. The decree having been passed after contest,
cannot be interfered with unless the counsel could prove perversity ... equity and
good conscience of this Court beseeching interference with a contested decree
passed in favour of the respondents.
9. It is no doubt true
respondents and
was upheld by the High Court. The decree having been passed after contest,
cannot be interfered with unless the counsel could prove perversity ... equity and
good conscience of this Court beseeching interference with a contested decree
passed in favour of the respondents.
9. It is no doubt true
respondents and
was upheld by the High Court. The decree having been passed after contest,
cannot be interfered with unless the counsel could prove perversity ... equity and
good conscience of this Court beseeching interference with a contested decree
passed in favour of the respondents.
9. It is no doubt true
