State vs Varun@Binny on 22 October, 2024
time but police had not taken any action.
Due to the continuous nuisance created by the accused, even his
brother Bobby had left his parental
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1376 (1.80 seconds)B.Mohanakumar vs Prem Kajla on 5 March, 2024
these illegal acts of
Defendant No. 1 are causing a continuous nuisance, problem and
inconvenience to the plaintiff and his family who are law abiding
Prem Kajila vs B Mohan Kumar on 5 March, 2024
these illegal acts of
Defendant No. 1 are causing a continuous nuisance, problem and
inconvenience to the plaintiff and his family who are law abiding
Mrs. Meena Bhanari vs Late Sh. Joginder Singh Mehta on 11 January, 2022
Since then plaintiff and her family
members have been facing a continuous nuisance and
disturbance from defendant no.1.
11.That the defendant
Gandhi Hospital Through Ar vs Tiis India Marketing Pvt Ltd. And Ors on 22 December, 2025
authorities on a
daily basis, creating a reasonable apprehension of recurring nuisance and
continued harassment, as evidenced by the incident dated 27.10.2022.
11. The Plaintiff ... that the plaintiff has proved interference and reasonable
apprehension of continued nuisance. In view of these findings, the contention
of the defendants that no cause
Sunil Kumar vs Asha on 30 April, 2007
stated
that the respondent did not mend her behaviour and her
conduct continued to be of way-ward and she would receive
calls and visits ... stated that such behaviour of the
respondent was a continuous nuisance and a source of
8
annoyance, irritation and mental torture to the petitioner
State vs . Arvind Singh Yadav on 28 April, 2022
impassable. It was
further submitted that accused has caused public nuisance and continued the same
despite asking of the IO to stop.
FINDINGS WITH REASONS ... punished with fine which may
extend to two hundred rupees.
291. Continuance of nuisance after injunction to discontinue.-
Whoever repeats or continues a public nuisance
Sukhbir Singh vs The State on 2 February, 2022
both the boys in PS for further enquiry in
view of continuous nuisance and misbehaviour. However,
the call was found bogus, as being made
Uday Aggarwal vs Vrindawan Cooperative Group Housing ... on 21 September, 2019
said construction.
The said illegal and unauthorized construction is constant and continuous
nuisance to the plaintiff as well as the other residents of the society
R.G. Gupta vs . Mcd & Ors. on 9 February, 2016
done by the defendants. Even
otherwise, the disputed structure is a continuous nuisance to the residents of
Aravali Apartments and therefore fresh period of limitation