Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

right of way is obstructed and such obstruction continues, then, nuisance continues and would give a right to the person to approach the authority

infringement hence the wrong arising out of that infringement is a continuing wrong. 11. In this connection we May refer to two decisions ... plaintiffs mehal it was in the nature of a continuing nuisance as to which the cause of Action was renewed de the in diem

right of way is obstructed and uch obstruction continues, then, nuisance continues and would give a right to the person to approach the authority

provide necessary police protection to the petitioner to ward off continued nuisance and physical obstruction on the part of the adjoining factory owners

every day on which such projection encroachment obstruction or deposit continues after the date of the first conviction for such offence. The function of Magistrate ... evidence there is no proper proof of the fact that the nuisance continued to be committed after the date of the first conviction for such

Committee observed that Shri Parmar is continuously playing blame-game till now. He is continuously creating nuisance to the Organization. He is gross indisciplined

abate the nuisance and does not prevent causing of nuisance, the health-hazard tot he public cannot be allowed to continue. By issuing this notice ... told is that "regulate your business, do not cause nuisance, if you continue to cause nuisance the measures so as to prevent

injunction pending inquiry and order to prohibit occupation or continuation of public nuisance; 7. Whereas Part-C of the same Chapter deals with almost similar ... because of pendency of their application for license, they cannot continue the public nuisance and that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate has while passing the impugned

bare power, with no means of compelling obedience. Otherwise the nuisance may be continued for ever and the plaintiff put to the necessity of bringing

till the decision thereon, the occupiers can merrily continue their business at the cost of public nuisance, safety and inconvenience. Normally, the Court should