interfered with the flow of water were in the nature of continuing nuisances as to which the cause of action was renewed ... obstruction to a water-course may rightly be described as a continuing nuisance, an obstruction to a way does not fall within that category
water from the watercourse
were in the nature of a "continuing nuisance" as to
which the cause of action was renewed ... wrongful interference with a right of way constitutes a
continuing nuisance ( Nazimulla v. Wazidulla AIR (1916)
Cal 733). With great deference, it must be said
regard to these two
obstructions that the question about the continuing wrong
fell to be considered; and the Privy Council held that the
said obstructions which ... plaintiff's mehal were in the nature of continuing
nuisance as to which the cause of action was renewed de die
in them
plaintiff's mehal were in the nature of continuing nuisances, as to which the cause of action was renewed de die in diem ... long as the obstructions causing such interference were allowed to continue. Indeed, Section 24 of the Statute contains express provision to that effect. For these
continuance of which is a new tort, a fresh cause of action for the continuance lies."
21. The cases of continuous injury were considered ... water from the water course were in the nature of a continuous nuisance as to which the cause of action was renewed
continuing right but to a continuing wrong. It is the very essence of a continuing wrong that it is an act which creates a continuing ... continue. If, however, a wrongful act is of such a character that the injury caused by it itself continues, then the act constitutes a continuing
house. Such an obstruction was found to be a continuing nuisance relying on the principle on which the Privy Council acted in Rajrup Koer ... interfere with a right of way are in the nature of continuing nuisance as to which cause of action is renewed de die in diem
remedy?
6. The wrong, as it seems to me, is a continuing wrong within the meaning of Section 23 of the Limitation Act. The principle ... obstructions and continuing nuisances as to which the cause of action accrued. It is immaterial that the parties are co-owners. The plaintiff
obstruction interfering with the right of the plaintiff was a continuing nuisance the cause of action whereof is renewed de die in diem so long ... room interfering with the access of the plaintiff herein is a continuing nuisance or tort for which the cause of action is renewed
house. Such an obstruction was found to be a continuing nuisance relying on the principle on which the Privy Council acted in Rajrup Koer ... interfer with a right of way are in the nature of continuing nuisance as to which cause of action is renewed de die in diem
