Neha Sharma Daughter Of Shri Ratan ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 8 August, 2022
working
with the respondent(s) on the post of junior faculty on contract
basis and while working on the post of junior faculty, the petitioner
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 258 (1.45 seconds)Bhavesh Kumar Shankhala S/O Shri Dinesh ... vs Dr. Rekha Mehra on 8 September, 2021
2018]
TEQIP project faculty or any other regular faculty, replacing the
guest faculty.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the material ... that the College has not engaged any
other teacher as guest faculty on contract basis and as such, there
is no question of replacement
Se Shailendra Jain vs State Of Raj & Anr on 31 January, 2011
expiry of term indicated in the contract. If and when vacancies are advertised whether on contract or regular basis, petitioners would be at liberty ... deny the necessity of availing services of the petitioners on contract basis in teaching faculty. The appointment orders of the petitioners indicate that they
Dr Rinku Mathur vs State Of Raj & Anr on 24 January, 2011
expiry of term indicated in the contract. If and when vacancies are advertised whether on contract or regular basis, petitioners would be at liberty ... deny the necessity of availing services of the petitioners on contract basis in teaching faculty. The appointment orders of the petitioners indicate that they
Avnish Tayal S/O Shri Dinesh Chand Tayal vs The State Of Rajasthan on 6 March, 2019
gave admissions in
transparent manner (3) there was a contract programme and
faculty was available, (4) practical work also held (5) DEC gave
ex-post
Akash vs State Of Raj And Anr on 3 May, 2024
respondent-company
invited petitioners herein to enter into contract for their
employment as faculty upon certain terms and conditions. The
complainant respondent obtained cheques ... could have
incurred to it by violation of any condition of the contract by the
petitioners:-
Sr. No. Drawer (petitioner) of Cheque Number and other
Brijesh Jindal vs State Of Raj And Anr on 3 May, 2024
respondent-company
invited petitioners herein to enter into contract for their
employment as faculty upon certain terms and conditions. The
complainant respondent obtained cheques ... could have
incurred to it by violation of any condition of the contract by the
petitioners:-
Sr. No. Drawer (petitioner) of Cheque Number and other
Paul Mitra vs State Of Raj And Anr on 3 May, 2024
respondent-company
invited petitioners herein to enter into contract for their
employment as faculty upon certain terms and conditions. The
complainant respondent obtained cheques ... could have
incurred to it by violation of any condition of the contract by the
petitioners:-
Sr. No. Drawer (petitioner) of Cheque Number and other
Nishant Gupta vs State Of Raj And Anr on 3 May, 2024
respondent-company
invited petitioners herein to enter into contract for their
employment as faculty upon certain terms and conditions. The
complainant respondent obtained cheques ... could have incurred to it by violation of
any condition of the contract by the petitioners:-
(Downloaded on 06/05/2024
Sanjay Kumar Singhal vs State Of Raj And Anr on 3 May, 2024
respondent-company
invited petitioners herein to enter into contract for their
employment as faculty upon certain terms and conditions. The
complainant respondent obtained cheques ... could have
incurred to it by violation of any condition of the contract by the
petitioners:-
Sr. No. Drawer (petitioner) of Cheque Number and other