question of "Concurrent jurisdiction".
a) Illustration I: Assuming, two
Contract Killers make an agreement
between themselves to extort money
4
and to kill ... Contract Act 1872, an
agreement which is enforceable by
law, is a "Contract". As per the
Section 2(g) of the Indian Contract
murder under Section 302
IPC, if the offender is a contract killer as apparent from the facts mentioned
in the judgment of the case ... that "if the offender is a contract killer as
apparent from the facts mentioned in the judgment of the case" but it does
dispute and who in turn had
hatched a conspiracy and engaged contract killers to eliminate
Anand. Banarasi and Bijender co-accused are stated to have ... acted
as contract killers and having shot Anand dead.
Insofar as the present petitioner is concerned, he is
sought to be implicated on the statement
bail application.
His contention is that petitioner has hired as contract killer which
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-3425/2018]
is evident from recording of CCTV ... Footage. With regard to
engaging the contract killer, it is contended by counsel for the
petitioner that petitioner has himself filed a complaint against
deceased and thus, they hired accused
no.2 who is contract killer. After causing her murder at the BDD
chawl in the house ... person standing on the road and
the accused no.2 was (contract killer) frequenting from the house
of the deceased to the said person
State Through Special Investigation ... vs Sajjan Kumar on 22 February, 2018
Author: Anu Malhotra
Bench
Robin (Driver of
Tarandeep) had hired a contract killer to kill him. They had given the
contract of killing for an amount
kill the deceased persons, namely, Haji
Mohammad and Mujib through contract killers and
7 M.Cr.C. Nos.19351 and 21194 of 2018
also gave ... There is prima facie evidence that double murder was
committed by contract killer at the instance of the
present applicant and other co-accused persons
vehemently submitted that
the petitioner and his co-accused are contract killers and they have been hired by
Ravinder Verma, who has property dispute with
Jahida Perves. Allegedly, she
engaged appellant Shaquib Ali @ Danger as a contract killer. As
per prosecution, Shaquib Ali @ Danger further engaged two
person namely, Tabish
