Section 9 in The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 [Entire Act]
child
.Whoever, being a male adult above eighteen years of age, contracts a child marriage shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment which may extend
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 6674 (2.45 seconds)The Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs Meena Variyal & Ors on 2 April, 2007
terms of
the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 . There was no special contract.
On 14.6.1999, the vehicle met with an accident. Suresh
Chandra Variyal, died ... employer, the insurance company
had no liability. There was no special contract and since it was
only a policy in terms of the Motor Vehicles
Section 11 in The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 [Entire Act]
promoting or permitting solemnisation of child marriages
(1) Where a child contracts a child marriage, any person having charge of the child, whether as parent ... until the contrary is proved, that where a minor child has contracted a marriage, the person having charge of such minor child has negligently failed
Bangalore Development Authority vs Syndicate Bank on 17 May, 2007
therefore the complaint
under the Act was not maintainable.
b) The contract did not stipulate any period for completion and
delivery. Being a building contract ... time was not the essence of
the contract. The project related to construction of 558 HIG
Houses. 490 houses were completed during 1989. The
contractor
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Anjana Shyam & Ors on 20 August, 2007
vehicle to be overloaded
had committed a fundamental breach of the contract of
insurance and therefore the insurance company could
repudiate the policy and hence ... insured and
they cannot be compelled to meet the award beyond the
contract of insurance itself. The appeals actually
challenge only the interim awards made
Himadri Chemicals Industries Ltd vs Coal Tar Refining Company on 7 August, 2007
this
appeal in this Court.
4. The appellant entered into a contract on
29th May, 2006 with the respondent by which the
respondent had agreed ... short goods) to the appellant as per schedule set
out in the contract. In the said contract, one of the
terms of payment was that
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Ltd vs G. Harischandra Reddy And Anr on 10 January, 2007
facts and circumstances of this
case, that Clause 29 of the Contract(Agreement) is not an
arbitration clause and due to want of jurisdiction ... claimant (respondent no.1)
concerning construction of Mulawad Lift Irrigation Scheme.
The contract was for 36 months. It was to be completed
P.C. Chacko And Another vs Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation ... on 20 November, 2007
said to be the reason for the aforementioned repudiation of the
contract of insurance.
4. It now stands admitted that the insured had undergone ... given by the insured that no untrue averment was made
therein, the contract of insurance was null and void and all monies which
had been
Mahatma Gandhi Sahakra Sakkare ... vs National Heavy Engg. Coop. Ltd. And Anr on 11 July, 2007
trial run by
25th July, 2003. It is submitted that the contract between the
parties envisaged four different kinds of bank guarantees to
ensure particular ... shall pay penalty by
an amount equal to =% (Half percent)
of the contract price for every
completed week of delay, but not
exceeding
Arunima Baruah vs Union Of India & Ors on 27 April, 2007
having offered the bribes is that the vendors could
have rescinded the contract. But they were not
bound to do so. They had the right ... well satisfied with the contract; it is a very
good one for us; we affirm it". The proposition put
forward by counsel