Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 4439 (2.06 seconds)

Acharya Madhavi Bhavin & 115 vs State Of Gujarat & on 7 September, 2016

regular appointment. The Court directed that appointment   of   908   Lecturers   of   Engineering   Colleges   and   Polytechnics,   who   were   appointed  on adhoc/contractual  basis and whose  services ... only two kinds of appointment. The first is the permanent  appointment   and   the   second   is   the   temporary   appointment.   The  temporary   appointments   have   various   sub­category
Gujarat High Court Cites 53 - Cited by 18 - J B Pardiwala - Full Document

State Of Odisha And Another vs Patitapaban Dutta Dash And Others on 12 April, 2023

from the date of contractual appointment prior to the publication of the said Resolution. Upon regular appointment, the contractual posts, if any, would get converted ... November, 2013. The 2013 Rules recognized two categories of contractual employees: (a) Category I: Contractual appointments/engagements made against contractual posts created with the concurrence
Orissa High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 12 - G Satapathy - Full Document

Shabir Ahmad Zahri. vs State Of J&K; & Ors. on 7 March, 2017

these contractual appointees shall be required to execute an agreement in accordance with the format appended to the Jammu and Kashmir Contractual Appointment Rules with ... respective posts, could not even be appointed on contractual basis dehors the Contractual Appointment Rules, 2003, the Government has taken a policy decision to extend
Jammu & Kashmir High Court - Srinagar Bench Cites 6 - Cited by 7 - A Magrey - Full Document

Indu Munshi And Ors. vs Uoi And Ors. on 23 May, 2018

appointed on regular basis. The teachers so appointed would be on whole time appointment of the school and could not accept any other appointment- paid ... orders extending their tenure of appointment from time to time have also specified that their appointment is on contractual terms and they could not claim
Delhi High Court Cites 44 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Ganesh Digamber Jambhrunkar And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 20 September, 2022

temporary/daily wagers appointed in violation of doctrine of equality or those appointed with a clear stipulation that such appointments would not confer any right ... accepted the contractual appointments as well as executed undertakings. They knew from the very beginning that the appointments were purely contractual, for specified time
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 5 - S V Marne - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next