Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 3695 (2.87 seconds)

Ganesh Digamber Jambhrunkar And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 20 September, 2022

temporary/daily wagers appointed in violation of doctrine of equality or those appointed with a clear stipulation that such appointments would not confer any right ... accepted the contractual appointments as well as executed undertakings. They knew from the very beginning that the appointments were purely contractual, for specified time
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 5 - S V Marne - Full Document

Rahul Sandu Ankushe And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 20 September, 2022

temporary/daily wagers appointed in violation of doctrine of equality or those appointed with a clear stipulation that such appointments would not confer any right ... accepted the contractual appointments as well as executed undertakings. They knew from the very beginning that the appointments were purely contractual, for specified time
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 1 - S V Marne - Full Document

Santosh S/O Datta Khadse And Another vs State Of Maha. Thr. Principal ... on 13 October, 2022

appointments. In response to the representations as made, the Lecturers were informed that their services cannot be regularised and that further appointments on contractual basis ... appointments and during that period the MPSC did not conduct any selection process. It was thus held that those lecturers who were appointed on contractual

Ganesh Digamber Jambhrunkar And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 20 September, 2022

temporary/daily wagers appointed in violation of doctrine of equality or those appointed with a clear stipulation that such appointments would not confer any right ... accepted the contractual appointments as well as executed undertakings. They knew from the very beginning that the appointments were purely contractual, for specified time
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - S V Marne - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra And Another vs Ganesh Digamber Jambhrunkar And Others on 20 September, 2022

temporary/daily wagers appointed in violation of doctrine of equality or those appointed with a clear stipulation that such appointments would not confer any right ... accepted the contractual appointments as well as executed undertakings. They knew from the very beginning that the appointments were purely contractual, for specified time
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - S V Marne - Full Document

Ganesh Digamber Jambhrunkar And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 20 September, 2022

temporary/daily wagers appointed in violation of doctrine of equality or those appointed with a clear stipulation that such appointments would not confer any right ... accepted the contractual appointments as well as executed undertakings. They knew from the very beginning that the appointments were purely contractual, for specified time
Bombay High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - S V Marne - Full Document

Mahindra And Mahindra Ltd. And Ors. Etc. ... vs Mr. Avinash D. Kamble And Ors. Etc. Etc. on 3 March, 2008

Industrial Disputes Act for justifying a contractual appointment for a fixed term. Even in the absence of Section 2(oo)(bb) , such an appointment could ... exclude termination of employment as a consequence of expiry of contractual appointment, from the rigours of retrenchment. Shri Thakur contended that the grievance of workmen
Bombay High Court Cites 52 - Cited by 13 - R C Chavan - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next