other contractual appointee. Petitioners
claim that no doubt petitioners cannot seek regularization, however, it is
argued that one contractual employee cannot be replaced by another ... contractual employee on more or less the same terms. Reliance is placed
upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of State
have been appointed on contractual basis, they
cannot be replaced by further contractual employees. In other words, a
contractual employee can be replaced ... extend the contractual employment of contractual employees. It
also made an observation that it is not a case where a contractual
employee is replaced
contractual basis with the Government,
has the same needs as any other child. A denial of CCL
to a government contractual employee would in effect ... person employed
23
on contractual basis is entitled for child care leave, but
this is with a rider. A contractual employee whose
employment is only
between a female regular
employee and a contractual employee/ad hoc employee
because a female employee whether regular, temporary or
ad hoc, is a female ... promote
gender equality. Every female employee and male employee
whether appointed on regular basis, contractual basis, ad
hoc/tenure or temporary basis have a fundamental
between a female regular
employee and a contractual employee/ad hoc employee because
a female employee whether regular, temporary or ad hoc, is a
female ... promote gender
equality. Every female employee and male employee whether
appointed on regular basis, contractual basis, ad hoc/tenure or
temporary basis have a fundamental
Central Warehousing Corportion vs Govt. Of India on 17 May, 2021
Author: Rajiv Shakdher
Bench
hold that since the petitioners were
appointed with mere nomenclature of contractual employee and
whereas their services is regular in nature with all trappings ... itself
was on contractual basis and extended for specified period each time. There is
no scheme for regularization of contractual employee placed by either party
hold that since the petitioners were
appointed with mere nomenclature of contractual employee and
whereas their services is regular in nature with all trappings ... itself
was on contractual basis and extended for specified period each time. There is
no scheme for regularization of contractual employee placed by either party
hold that since the petitioners were
appointed with mere nomenclature of contractual employee and
whereas their services is regular in nature with all trappings ... itself
was on contractual basis and extended for specified period each time. There is
no scheme for regularization of contractual employee placed by either party
hold that since the petitioners were
appointed with mere nomenclature of contractual employee and
whereas their services is regular in nature with all trappings ... itself
was on contractual basis and extended for specified period each time. There is
no scheme for regularization of contractual employee placed by either party
