judicial order violating the procedure established by law. You passed two contradictory orders U/s 39 (2) CPC in O.S. No. 1478/2011 ... submitted his written statement dated 19.04.2017 denying the charges. Regarding passing contradictory orders in two suits, the petitioner submitted that the cause of action
Senior Counsel that
the contention of the respondent regarding self-
contradictory orders being passed on 27.04.2015 in the
main file and the bail matter ... extraneous
consideration, then the appellant would never have
passed a contradictory order in the first place.
26. The learned Senior Counsel for the appellant concluded
proceedings of the enquiry ordered against him. The trial Court initially granted the ex parte order but latter vacated the order. The plaintiff went ... order and directed the defendant to refrain from proceeding further with the enquiry. But it sustained the order of suspension. Aggrieved by this order, both
view of the fact that the assessing authority has given contradictory orders as is apparent on the face of the record. In cases of Bharat ... misconceived. In the present case the assessing authority has given two contradictory orders in the same subject-matter and it is the bounden duty
examined, non-entertainment of this application would create
a possible contradictory orders; one by NCLT and another by the
Civil Court. It has further been ... civil suit which
has been filed to obtain a possible contradictory order despite the
fact that the original defendants are the members of the respondent
aside the entire auction process and this,
consequently, has resulted in contradictory orders by two different
benches of the Bombay High Court. He therefore submitted ... delay and having regard to
the fact that there cannot be contradictory orders by the very same High
Court in respect of the very same
aside the entire auction process and this,
consequently, has resulted in contradictory orders by two different
benches of the Bombay High Court. He therefore submitted ... delay and having regard to
the fact that there cannot be contradictory orders by the very same High
Court in respect of the very same
January, 2003. Petitioner contends that the Appellate Court passed two mutually contradictory orders in relation to the annual general meeting dated ... contends that even Co-operative Appellate Court has passed mutually contradictory orders and said respondent, has derived benefit thereof. He contends that in such circumstances
pursuance of the same the Corporation passed an order
dated 6.4.2004 that an order passed by it would be subject to the decision ... said pending writ petition as it is necessary that
contradictory orders must not be passed in similar circumstances.
28. The High Court could not have
M/S. New Delhi Television Ltd., New ... vs Dcit, New Delhi on 14 July, 2017