Section 221 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
giving false evidence, although it cannot be proved which of these contradictory statements was false
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 53738 (8.54 seconds)Emperor vs Purshottam Ishvar Amin on 29 October, 1920
erroneous opinion that alternative charges could not be framed where the contradictory statements fell under different parts of Section 193.
9. But under Section ... prove that one of the statements was false or whether the mere fact that the statements were contradictory was sufficient for a conviction
Purshottam Ishvar Amin vs Emperor on 11 October, 1920
erroneous opinion that alternative charges could not be framed where the contradictory statements fell under different parts of Section 193.
9. But under Section ... prove that one of the statements was false or whether the mere fast that the statements were contradictory was sufficient for a conviction
Umrao Lal vs State on 5 October, 1953
contradictory statements intentionally, there is nothing to show that the earlier statement was wrong and was corrected by the subsequent statement and he does ... first statement made on 17-11-50 was incorrect; in his statement as an accused he stated that both the statements were correct
Queen-Empress vs Ghulet And Anr. on 31 July, 1884
said (or any other Court), that (here enter the second statement), such statements being contradictory of each other, on a point material to the issue ... contradictory statements is false. Both statements may perhaps be false, but one only can be true. It is possible, indeed, that the first statement
Jiwa Ram vs The State on 10 September, 1964
faced with their earlier contradictory statements, they merely made statement to the effect that they had never made such statements at the investigating stage. They ... effort to explain the various contradictory statements and come forward with mere statements to the effect that earlier statements either at the investigating stage
Umrao Lal vs State on 5 October, 1953
contradictory statements intentionally, there is nothing to show that the earlier statement was wrong and was corrected by the subsequent statement and he does ... first statement made on 17-11-50 was incorrect; in his statement as an accused he stated that both the statements were correct. Salt
Smt.Guro vs Atma Singh And Ors on 5 March, 1992
respondent No. 1. The respondent No.1 has made
contradictory statements about his presence at the time of
execution of the will. The High Court ... appellate court has found that respondent no. 1 had
made contradictory statement with respect to his presence at
the time of the execution
Shabir Hussein Bholu vs State Of Maharashtra on 28 September, 1962
jury trial for
murder. Before the Court he gave a statement contradictory
to the one he had given before the committing court. After
the conclusion ... prosecuted under s. 193, I.P.C . for making contradictory
statements regarding the same incident. In pursuance of
that notice the appellant appeared before
Ajodhya Prasad Bhargava vs Bhawani Shanker Bhargava And Anr. on 8 May, 1956
made a statement inconsistent with the previous statements without explaining as to how and under what circumstances he had made the earlier statement.
As already ... statement on oath made in Court. It is only when the maker of the admission enters the witness-box and makes a statement contradictory