made to remove the
conflicting views on effect of
location/possession/control/delivery/use of the
royalty rights etc. by the user in India without ... been
explained to be fulfilled whether or not, the
location/possession/control/delivery/use of the
rights, property or equipment, etc. by the user
grams of LSD
which is of commercial quantity. When controlled delivery of
the parcel was tendered, it was the petitioner who accepted ... postmaster through UPI - phonepay for having received the
controlled delivery of the parcel. The petitioner admitted that
there was controlled delivery of the parcel
provides for
controlled delivery which is a technique of allowing illicit or
suspect consignment of Narcotic Drugs to pass out or through
::: Downloaded ... other officer authorized by
him in this regard can undertake controlled delivery of any
consignment to any destination in India. The police could have
easily
accused No. 2 with contact number. In follow up action,
controlled delivery was effected on 06.06.2025 and
dummy parcel was received by both the accused ... required under Section 50-A of NDPS Act
to undertake controlled delivery operation with respect to
parcel having tracking No. RQ137229372DE. Pursuant to
the said
authorised the then
Superintendent and Intelligence Officer, NCB, MZU, to
undertake controlled delivery in respect of the said consignment
allegedly containing narcotic drug or psychotropic ... 29th March, 2019, the officers
of NCB collected the consignment under controlled delivery
operation. The officers of NCB and the panch witnesses
thereafter reached Mumbra
accused No. 2 with contact number. In follow up action,
controlled delivery was effected on 06.06.2025 and
dummy parcel was received by both the accused ... required under Section 50-A of NDPS Act
to undertake controlled delivery operation with respect to
parcel having tracking No. RQ137229372DE. Pursuant to
the said
2025 at 23:34:58
registered.
2.3 A controlled delivery operation was thereafter planned using dummy
parcels. During the controlled delivery operation conducted on 11th ... accused Anil Kumar and Mohit Jaiswal on the
date of the controlled delivery.
2.5. Investigation further revealed that the mobile number mentioned on
the intercepted
learned counsel elicited
from him that he know the meaning of control delivery
under NDPS Act and the present case is not a case ... control delivery and also the learned counsel questioned the
PW.1 regarding the procedure followed by him while
following the procedure of seizure
impersonating as delivery executive and requested
him to give his correct address for delivery of parcel, the
accused gave correct address for delivery of parcel ... procedure under Section 50A of NDPS Act, the process
of controlled delivery is inadmissible in evidence. Moreover,
there are no materials to show that
delivery in the present
case was a case of controlled delivery, as decided by the Zonal Director.
How credible the said witnesses ... there is not a whisper that present is a case of
controlled delivery and admittedly the accused never took delivery of the
parcel in question
