Amendment of 2005 to the Hindu Succession Act,
1956 which has conferred coparcenary rights to the women, equivalent to
that of men, is a quintessence ... woman as a Karta, despite having
been conferred equal rights equal coparcenary rights as men, has emerged
in the present case, leaving the ball
properties.
27. It is denied that there was no coparcenary property. The business as
well as the property in question, was claimed ... coparcenary
property.
28. The defendant No. 1-Vinod Gupta has asserted that only fault
committed by him is that the parents of his wife, defendant
providing that on the demise of the
coparcener, his interest in coparcenary property would not be governed by
this Act, but would devolve by survivorship ... Hindu Succession Act, 2005 provides for "deemed division" of the
coparcenary property on the demise of a coparcener; abrogation of
inheritance by survivorship
father, the Suit
was not merely founded on the claim of coparcenary, but also on settled
possession, family arrangements and protection against illegal
dispossession. Even ... purchase,
resulting in joint ownership.
21. The distinction between co-ownership and coparcenary cannot be
overlooked. Mere joint acquisition of property by siblings does
court to grant relief by injunction
restraining the karta from alienating the coparcenary property.‖
63. It is thus, explained that a coparcener has no right ... Raghavachariar's, Hindu law, 5TH Edition at p. 838, the concept
„coparcenary' was defined as under:
―Co-parcenary is a narrower over body
court to grant relief by injunction
restraining the karta from alienating the coparcenary property.‖
63. It is thus, explained that a coparcener has no right ... Raghavachariar's, Hindu law, 5TH Edition at p. 838, the concept
„coparcenary' was defined as under:
―Co-parcenary is a narrower over body
principles in regard to
the partition and possession of the shares of coparcenary, co-owners, co-
sharerers or joint owners. It was explained that while ... self-acquired property or ancestral
property or joint property or coparcenary property in his/her hand, and if
so, who are/were the coparceners
father. The Suit was not merely founded on the claim of
coparcenary, but also on settled possession, family arrangements and
protection against illegal dispossession. Even ... nothing to show
that a joint family existed or there was a coparcenary formed inter se the
brothers. It is simplicitor case where the property
father-in-law has not the means
to do so from any coparcenary property in his
possession out of which the daughter ... owned by the member of the family of the
respondent are the coparcenary properties. Burden
to show that a particular property is a coparcenary
property
However, some properties have yet not been sold and
formed part of coparcenary. It was also claimed by the plaintiff that since
the defendant ... already taken more than 50% of his share in the
coparcenary property, he is not entitled to any share in the properties that
remain. Rather
