Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (0.72 seconds)

Deepak.D vs Kumar.N on 2 April, 2016

clear that, the evidence of Rw-1 is not supported with proper documents. On 23 MVC.No.4208/2014 SCCH-18 the other hand ... produced the copy of Temporary permit obtained by the owner of the alleged car. On perusal of the copy of said document (unmarked), it shows
Bangalore District Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt.Sakamma vs Sri.Nayazuddin on 15 September, 2016

behalf. He has produced Xerox documents during arguments which remained unmarked and the said documents can not be considered as evidence. 17. RW.1:Rajalakshmi ... elicited from her to disbelieve her evidence. 18. Ex.R2 is copy of policy which reveals that the respondent no.2 has issued policy
Bangalore District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Anuradha vs Sri. Mahadeva N on 24 June, 2016

defendant has not appeared before the court and not produced any rebuttal documents to disbelieve the version of plaintiff. On the other hand, the Plaintiff ... suit schedule shop, the plaintiff has relied upon the copy of rental agreements (unmarked) and reply notice issued by the defendant. On perusal of copy
Bangalore District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next