copyright in India was to be found in the Imperial Copyright Act of 1911 as modified by the Indian Copyright Act , III of 1914 ... Copyright Act, 1911, continued in force after January 1950. Acting in pursuance of the powers conferred by Article 372 (2) the Copyright Act of 1914
works for gain". The prior Act, which ACT XIV of 1957 superseded, was the Indian Copyright Act, 1914. Section 13 of which provided that ... similar provision is found in the previous Act (Indian Copyright Act ) (Act III of 1914,) whose first schedule incorporated the English Copyright Act
labour of the artist; and it certainly entitles him to claim copyright in the product of his labour. No more need be said to reject ... Indian Copyright Act, 1927 , do not apply to this case, and we have to look to the provisions of the Indian Copyright Act, 1914. This
work' in Section 35 of the Copyright Act of 1911 adopted by the Indian Copyright Act, 1914 the calculation charts could be treated ... Indian Copyright Act, 1914 was in force. The relevant provisions of the aforesaid Act are as follows:--
Section 2 . In this act, unless there
original one, the question of copyright therein would depend upon the protection given by the statute. Copyright is the exclusive right of multiplying for sale ... Section 3 of the Indian Copyright Act III of 1914, the Copyright Act of 191L enacted by the British Parliament, subject to such modifications
labour of the artist; and it certainly entitled him to claim copyright in the product of his labour. No more need be said to reject ... Indian Copyright Act, 1957 , do not apply to this case, and we have to look to the provisions of Indian Copyright Act, 1914. This Act
first time by the Imperial Copyright Act of 1911, which is extended to India by the Indian Copyright Act, 1914. Under Section
These Acts were enforced in India; and apart from the earlier Acts we had Acts of 1836 and 1842. But in these Acts the sole ... concerned before the Act of 1914, no such right subsists after that Act. The defendant has therefore not infringed any copyright at all. As regards
Madras City Civil Courts Act, 1892, and Section 13 of the Old Copyright Act of 1914, were differently worded with this very material difference that ... Judge to enable, or entitle it to assume jurisdiction under the Copyright Act .
15. In the above view of the matter, we would allow these
Act III of 1914, which admittedly governs the rights of parties, though subsequently repealed by Act XIV of 1957. Section 1(2) of the Act ... this Act conferred on the owner of the copyright; provided that the following acts shall not constitute an infringement of copyright - (i) Any fair dealing
