scale and reimbursing
the same to him, correction of date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as it was fixed
arbitrarily ... seeking action taken report by directing
the PIO to correct the date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as 19.04.1991, in place
scale and reimbursing
the same to him, correction of date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as it was fixed
arbitrarily ... seeking action taken report by directing
the PIO to correct the date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as 19.04.1991, in place
scale and reimbursing
the same to him, correction of date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as it was fixed
arbitrarily ... seeking action taken report by directing
the PIO to correct the date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as 19.04.1991, in place
scale and reimbursing
the same to him, correction of date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as it was fixed
arbitrarily ... seeking action taken report by directing
the PIO to correct the date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as 19.04.1991, in place
scale and reimbursing
the same to him, correction of date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as it was fixed
arbitrarily ... seeking action taken report by directing
the PIO to correct the date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as 19.04.1991, in place
scale and reimbursing
the same to him, correction of date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as it was fixed
arbitrarily ... seeking action taken report by directing
the PIO to correct the date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as 19.04.1991, in place
scale and reimbursing
the same to him, correction of date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as it was fixed
arbitrarily ... seeking action taken report by directing
the PIO to correct the date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as 19.04.1991, in place
scale and reimbursing
the same to him, correction of date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as it was fixed
arbitrarily ... seeking action taken report by directing
the PIO to correct the date of merger in Corrigendum G.O. Ms. No. 63 as 19.04.1991, in place
approached the Commission.
Proceedings Before the Commission:
3. Appellant wanted a corrigendum with corrected information regarding audit of the
society for the period
through VC;
The appellant stated that the respondents have wrongly supplied 'corrigendum' which was
never requested in the RTI application. The APIO explained ... instead of '2013' and the
corrigendum was issued to correct the mistake. He further stated that the information sought by
the appellant relates
