senior counsel
appearing for respondent No.1, briefly submitted that the
correct corrigendum dated 22.02.2011 is produced as
Annexure-R1-C at Page ... same day, a corrigendum was issued deleting the words
"until further orders." This corrigendum is produced by the
appellant as Annexure-F. However
directing the
respondent No.3 to take steps to issue necessary
correction/corrigendum to include the remaining extent of
56.25 square meters which has been ... receipt of
certified copy of this order, if no such
correction/corrigendum is issued. The respondent No.4
shall thereafter process the matter as expeditiously
which is by way of
said corrigendum is increased to 3 years. By this act of
issuance of corrigendum, the petitioner ... Public
Procurements, Rules, 2000 ('Rules' for short) permits any
correction corrigendum to be issued prior to opening of the
tenders. He would submit
PASSED BY THE R2 THE SPECIAL
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE, QUASH THE
CORRIGENDUM/ CORRECTION ORDER ANNEXURE-A DATED
25.06.2005 MADE IN REVN.PETN.94/1999
that it was an error in reference,
the appropriate Government by its corrigendum dated
14.01.2015 - Annexure-F altered the Reference and
ordered thus ... dispute will have to be considered
in terms of the corrigendum correcting the reference, as it
was long before the disposal of the dispute
dated 13.08.2015
ordered family pension and earned leave benefits.
Thereafter by correction/corrigendum order dated
28.09.2015 granted family pension and earned leave
holding the petitioner
directing the respondent No.3 to take steps to issue
necessary correction/corrigendum to include the
remaining extent of 56.25 square meters which has been ... receipt of certified copy of this order, if no
such correction/corrigendum is issued. The respondent
No.4 shall thereafter process the matter as expeditiously
India praying to direct the
R-3 to issue the corrigendum by correcting the name
from Krishnappa to Kristappa ... writ, order or direction, directing the
3rd respondent to issue the corrigendum by
correcting the name of Krishnappa to
3
Kristappa
that as per the official
memorandum, endorsement dated 5.2.2013 and later
corrigendum correcting the same on 12.2.2013, the
complainants have been allotted sites and site
could only mean correction or certification of a mistake in the original notification. Such correction dates back to notification corrected, namely, Notification ... Legislature. Since I have taken the view that the corrigendum notification is only a notification correcting a mistake in the original notification, in my view
