further delay.
8.3 That the Respondents further be directed to
issue Corrigendum/amendment/Correction slip
in Indian Railway Establishment Manual
Volume1, henceforth in view ... direct recruit that prayer 8.3 in which it is prayed that
corrigendum/amendment/corrections slip be issued in
IREM VolumeI is itself a prayer
disposed vide order dt. 05.07.2016 directing "to
challenge the correctness of the impugned corrigendums by raising additional
grounds before the Commissioner of Income ... permitting the Assessee to challenge the correctness of the
corrigendum by raising additional grounds before the
CIT(Appeals) in the appeal petitions which were filed
fact
nothing but challenge to the advertisement dated
28.03.2011 as corrected by Corrigendum dated 4.05.2011.
Significantly, the petitioner has not directly challenged the
advertisement ... selection is in terms of the advertisement dated
28.03.2011 as corrected by Corrigendum dated 4.05.2011.
13] As noted earlier, the advertisement as corrected, had
clearly
along
with order of assessment but, later on, issued a corrigendum
providing that reference to the section would be read as
271AAB instead of 271AAA ... Officer, after
having initially issued notice under section 271AAA , shortly
issued corrigendum correcting the reference to the statutory
provision as 271AAB. This was thus
along
with order of assessment but, later on, issued a corrigendum
providing that reference to the section would be read as
271AAB instead of 271AAA ... Officer, after
having initially issued notice under section 271AAA , shortly
issued corrigendum correcting the reference to the statutory
provision as 271AAB. This was thus
corrected as
"Consequently, the present appeal, being devoid of merits, is
dismissed."
The Registry is directed to carry necessary correction.
Corrigendum, if required
regarding advances given, figure mentioned is Rs.
4,13,848/- whereas correct figure is Rs. 34,48,733/-. The figure ... typographical mistakes are hereby corrected.
Corrigendum
Para no .7- The figure of Rs. 4,13,848/- be read as Rs. 34,48,733/-.
Para
newspaper dated 12-10-
92.
Q. It is correct that in the corrigendum the offer was
valid upto 16th October 92 and deliveries ... given in corrigendum of
25.10.1992 were acted upon. It is correct that the
corrigendum last supply was to be made by
25.10.1992 irrespective
least in ten out of
twelve cases is found to be correct. The said ten cases, as noted
above, relate to the assessment order dated ... receipt of the said order". Since the said order was corrected by
corrigendum issued on 04.05.2012, the stipulated period within which
complaints could
property was taken
before publication of corrigendum, but the finding
is not factually correct. As the publication of corri
gendum was with regard ... Appellate Tribunal,
we are of the view that the corrigendum is nothing but a
correction of the demand notice, but size, boundaries
and description
