reason
that correction means whatever written was not correct or
there was some mistake which need be corrected. A
correction or corrigendum precedes an inherent ... admitting this mistake the
same is being rectified/corrected and hence a
correction/corrigendum.
8. Normally the word "corrigendum" is used when
correction
reason
that correction means whatever written was not correct or
there was some mistake which need be corrected. A
correction or corrigendum precedes an inherent ... admitting this mistake the
same is being rectified/corrected and hence a
correction/corrigendum.
8. Normally the word "corrigendum" is used when
correction
reason
that correction means whatever written was not correct or
there was some mistake which need be corrected. A
correction or corrigendum precedes an inherent ... admitting this mistake the
same is being rectified/corrected and hence a
correction/corrigendum.
8. Normally the word "corrigendum" is used when
correction
Government issued a Notification
No. 36/2010-ST dated 28.6.20103, corrected by Corrigendum dated
29.6.2010, providing exemption from payment of service tax on the
advances ... terms of Notification No. 36/2010-ST dated 28.06.2010
as corrected vide Corrigendum dated 29.06.2010 read
with CBEC, New Delhi under its letter
examining the effect of a
corrigendum held;
"8. Normally the word "corrigendum" is used when correction is made
in a printed matter ... termed corrigendum.
9. The meaning of "corrigendum" is "an error to be corrected
especially an error in print". The word
reason that correction means whatever written was not correct or there was some mistake which needs to be corrected. A correction or corrigendum precedes ... this mistake the same is being rectified/corrected and hence a corrigendum /correction.
20. This brings me to the position that after issuance of corrigendum
appellant, the department issued a corrigendum dated 14th May 2012, that it is only after receipt of this corrigendum that the appellant filed the appeal ... discrepancy by the appellant that the department issued a corrigendum correcting the date of hearing as 11/3/12 in para 15 of the order
there is an error in the impugned order, which have been corrected by corrigendum dated 5.1.2012. The Revenues appeal is against the issue
different number, but in fact, it was a corrigendum to the earlier Order correcting the typographical/arithmetical error that had crept into the Order inadvertently ... figures in the respective table, which ought to have been corrected by an addendum/corrigendum to the Order. Precisely, it is his submission that even
Mukesh Kumar vs Commissioner Of Customs (Ii), Chennai on 17 February, 2026
CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND
