aforesaid submissions were made.
Respondent-State, therefore, submitted that the corrigendum has been
correctly issued by following due process of law and to clarify ... 3712.2017-J.doc
21. In our view, a corrigendum can be issued only to correct a
typographical error or omission therein. The dictionary meaning
aforesaid submissions were made.
Respondent-State, therefore, submitted that the corrigendum has been
correctly issued by following due process of law and to clarify ... 3712.2017-J.doc
21. In our view, a corrigendum can be issued only to correct a
typographical error or omission therein. The dictionary meaning
aforesaid submissions were made.
Respondent-State, therefore, submitted that the corrigendum has been
correctly issued by following due process of law and to clarify ... 3712.2017-J.doc
21. In our view, a corrigendum can be issued only to correct a
typographical error or omission therein. The dictionary meaning
aforesaid submissions were made.
Respondent-State, therefore, submitted that the corrigendum has been
correctly issued by following due process of law and to clarify ... 3712.2017-J.doc
21. In our view, a corrigendum can be issued only to correct a
typographical error or omission therein. The dictionary meaning
aforesaid submissions were made.
Respondent-State, therefore, submitted that the corrigendum has been
correctly issued by following due process of law and to clarify ... 3712.2017-J.doc
21. In our view, a corrigendum can be issued only to correct a
typographical error or omission therein. The dictionary meaning
aforesaid submissions were made.
Respondent-State, therefore, submitted that the corrigendum has been
correctly issued by following due process of law and to clarify ... 3712.2017-J.doc
21. In our view, a corrigendum can be issued only to correct a
typographical error or omission therein. The dictionary meaning
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KERALA STATE WAQF
BOARD ISSUED AS A CORRIGENDUM CORRECTING A
TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN EXHIBIT P6 ORDER.
Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY
indicated as 546.
5. The petitioner tried to file a Titamma (Corrigendum) seeking correction in the said sale deed which was not permitted which, thus ... make the correction in the sale deed after taking due charges. In pursuance thereof, the petitioner filed an application for correction / Titamma / Corrigendum which
Original
No.27/GST/AC/2023 dated 07.12.2023 as further corrected by Corrigendum-II
dated 07.03.2024 for the tax period 2019-20 and quash ... filed challenging the impugned order of
assessment dated 07.12.2023 as corrected by Corrigendum-II dated 07.03.2024
for the period 2019-2020, on the premise that
Board of Secondary Education dated
February 11, 2011 read with a correction corrigendum
dated March 1, 2011, Annexure-P12 at pages
