accused has been charge-sheeted by the
Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau,
Bengaluru, for the offence punishable under Section ... Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 .
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that a
written complaint dated 26.10.2004 was given
Prevention of
Corruption Act
Opinion of the Judge Acquitted
Date of Judgment 09-10-2018
JUDGMENT
The Police Inspector, Karnataka Lokayukta, City Division,
Bengaluru ... read with
Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, (in short
P.C. Act ).
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case
Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 .
Charges framed : 120-B r/w.420 of
Indian Penal Code ,
468, 471 and 477-A of
Indian Penal Code ... read
with r/w. Sec.13(1)(d)
of Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988.
10. Opinion of the Judge : As per final order
11. State
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and
substantive offences u/s 420 IPC and Section ... Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 ?
(10)What Order?
8. My findings on the above points are as follows:
POINT No.1: In the Negative
POINT
Section 13 (2) r/w.13
(1)(d) of Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 .
10. Opinion of the Judge : As per final order ... Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 .
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that
Prevention of Corruption
Act, 1988 .
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case is as under : -
(a) During 2015 Complainant/Cw1/Ashok Babu ... charge at the office of
SP, CBI, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Ganganagar, Bangalore.
(g) Further, on receipt of the complaint, the said complaint
was marked
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 .
2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that: -
(a) Dr. B.V. Navaneeth/accused was working as
public ... Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 . The
said charge was read over to the accused. The accused
denied the charges leveled against him, and claims
Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 .
10. Opinion of the Judge : As per final order
(S.H.PUSHPANJALI DEVI)
XLVI Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge ... Prevention of Corruption Act,
1988 .
2. The brief facts of the case of prosecution alleged
against accused Nos.1 to 3 are that, the accused
Prevention of
Corruption Act .
Opinion of the Judge Acquitted
Date of Judgment 10-09-2018
JUDGMENT
The Police Inspector, Karnataka Lokayukta, City
Division, Bengaluru ... read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988.
2. Brief facts of the prosecution case is as under:
Accused-S.N.Jagadeesh
Sections 7, 13(1) (d) r/w 13 (2)
of Prevention of Corruption
Act, 1988 .
2. Date of
Commission
09.01.2013
of offence
3. Date ... section 7 ,
13(1) (d) r/w 13(2) of
Prevention of Corruption
Act, 1988 .
JUDGMENT
The accused is charge sheeted for the offence punishable
